It seems to be free if you come back and get the battery you dropped off - which seems to makes it possible to drive across the country with no more than 90-second battery stops, and drop them all back off taking the same route back.
Don't know if they'll be okay with that, but it's an awesome possibility. That's thousands of miles with free (renewable) energy and fast.
This seems to point towards a battery lease solution.
Having to worry about the relative cost of your battery vs the one you are swapping for could make this a bit of a lottery. Also possibly bribing the attendant to give you a much newer one instead of the old creaky pack that no one wants.
It looks like a great place for Tesla to find old batteries and remove them from circulation.
Leasing seems like a good idea (pay X per year and you can use these stations and you'll always end up with a battery of a certain acceptable quality), according to the video though it does cost money.
this seems like the only reasonable solution that would get people to use this. When people buy these cars they should get the option to sign up for this service that includes a yearly cost that covers the maintenance and replacement of batteries. This way they can just let people swap batteries without worrying about getting different batteries and it also alleviates the worries about having to eventually replace all the batteries in the car. If this way is not economically feasible than Tesla is dead already, this is the only option that will make sense to consumers and Tesla needs to make it happen.
It would be interesting to try to work out for certain types of people the cost of powering an Tesla.
When you fill up a petrol / diesel engine you have one option: petrol / diesel.
When you fill up an Tesla (and other electric cars have different possibilities) you have:
- Recharging on your home power, which would cost whatever your home power costs but can only be used when you are OK charging over night
- Recharging at one of those Tesla fast stations, which costs nothing, but takes 40min
- Swapping a battery at a Tesla station, which takes 90 seconds and costs $??
The price then depends on the mix of those three strategies, which is determined by your usage (drive to and from work every day, it's your home power etc)
I'm assuming the tesla doesn't phone home here but battery swapping also allows tesla to keep a much closer eye on the packs and possibly even swap faulty batteries without owners knowing.
That might be worth it to save the PR of a burnt out tesla from a failed battery.
I don't believe batteries are solid units - I think they are made up of thousands of individual smaller batteries. So Tesla can probably swap out the smaller pieces in chunks to keep any one battery from getting too bad.
Who says you have to lease one physical battery. Perhaps the battery lease is "a" battery and not "your" battery and Tesla takes care of maintaining them all. And when new batteries come out, you can have the option of upgrading to those. In the future, the station could have three types of batteries for customers to choose from, just like gas.
Sounds like when I get my propane tank filled. They don't care what condition it is in. I get a freshly painted filled one every time. And if I want, I can pay for a bigger one.
Even better would be if on their webpage it showed perhaps a little diagram or animation loop or something for those that didn't want to watch the video.
Seemed super fake because of that one lady/superfan. I'm not suggesting the audience was seeded - it's more likely just a few ass kissers in the crowd - but wow, that really just killed any genuine enthusiasm I would have had while watching.
Edit: The enthusiasm seemed fake, not the actual tech being demonstrated, which seems straight-forward.
Maybe, but I doubt it. Tesla owners and investors seem to be very excited about Tesla - more so than Apple "fanbois" are about Apple new launches, I would say. At the investors' meeting recently, a lot of people seemed very excited there.
Lots of Telsa owners at the party, enjoying a free free drink or three before the event. No surprise that they were a bit enthusiastic at seeing a previously unannounced free feature launch.
There's so much fake/forced enthusiasm around many startups that after a while the it's pretty easy to spot. (Example: The person exclaiming "What the...?" at the beginning, when everyone knew what was going to be shown. C'mon.) The really sad thing is people trying to will things to be more exciting than they really are.
If anything, I found the cheering contagious: I broke out with a big smile and laughed that there were others who thought this was as welcome and significant a demonstration of technology as I.
The beauty of this is that with battery technology rapidly improving, and performance for new batteries much better than older ones, Tesla's cars can retain or even increase their expected mileage per charge over the life of the car.
The expected lifespan of their batteries right now are about 7 years, but as anyone with a smartphone or laptop knows, battery life decreases rapidly over the life of the product. Tesla's cars were no exception to this and although most of the cars on the road are new and have not faced these issues yet, they were bound to crop up in the future. With battery swapping they've nipped this problem in the bud. Of course they'll charge you the difference for a newer battery but the benefits far outweigh the costs, and breeds stronger brand loyalty.
I'd really like to hear more about what this means, from the article:
Frenzied drivers will still have to do some work though —
they’ll have to drop off the battery on the return leg of
their journey and pay an unspecified “transport fee”, ...
A legitimate worry is that you'll end up with someone else's lemon battery. Is the article referring to a Tesla mandate that you come back for your "original" battery, and how long do you have before you forfeit your battery?
The way you would want it done is as long as you own the car you pay some annual fee for battery swaps but then you can swap whenever you want. You would have to sign up at the point of sale for the service and not be able to situationally opt out whenever you weren't driving long distances with a desire for swaps though, because the idea is that you subsidize the fact you never need to "replace" your battery now and Tesla needs to keep up battery stocks with some fraction of the cost each year.
You left out the other part, which I think is significant:
... though they can also choose to keep the battery and pony up the
difference between the price between of the old and new batteries.
It's hard to say how much of an issue that is going to be without knowing the typical prices. Also, it needs to be balanced against the fact that a typical supercharger recharge is free.
>A legitimate worry is that you'll end up with someone else's lemon battery.
I was under the impression that these battery packs had so much monitoring and control technology built in, that would be very unlikely. Most batteries become lemons because on of the cells dies a death, becoming a short, which in turn drags down the other cells.
Tesla have a battery technology which is ment to be very advanced at managing each cell to prevent them catching fire, I would imagine they have very accurate wear level information on them too.
I think the station will only house the newest version of the battery. You will not get your old battery back on the way back, as some explain, but you will get a new random battery every time. That is why the service is not free.
When battery technology is upgraded they will switch the entire stock for a new one. So there will be no anxiety for getting an old one.
It makes sense that they built the battery to be swappable but its pretty incredible that they managed to keep this as a post-launch surprise. Everyone last month was like 'well I dont see how that can be possible, the battery makes up most of the car frame etc'. But they'd planned it this way all along.
Its as if the new iPhone came with a swappable battery but Apple kept it quiet till six months after launch.
> Its as if the new iPhone came with a swappable battery but Apple kept it quiet till six months after launch.
Since the phone is entirely taken apart by specialized sites within hours of its availability, there's no way they would manage to hide a swappable battery.
Well, iPhones don't cost $60,000 and up (nor do they weigh 5000 pounds), so ripping one apart and voiding the warranty to see what is inside isn't nearly as much of a big deal.
Electric aircraft is a genuinely bad idea. Converting the electricity to fuel and burning it is vastly more efficient than having to lift and land with both sides of the chemical equation.
It appears they jack up the car, drop the floor out from under it, unbolt and drop the battery, bring another battery up under and re-bolt it. A very simple procedure that is likely rather difficult to implement; interesting to think about what sort of machinery they have down in the pit to move the batteries around...
Yup, underneath. The battery makes up basically the whole underside of the car, it seems they drop it straight down. I have no idea how the power/data coupling works though, maybe that stuff just slots in?
Definitely some interesting little details to iron out. The alignment should be easy. Just have to park within some tolerance, and the unbolting platform can rotate to adjust.
I wonder about the unbolting. What if one of the (what seemed like) dozen screwdriver bits fails? Screw the rest back on and fail the procedure? Also can the re-bolting fail, e.g. by dropping the bolt? Would your car end up with fewer and fewer bolts over time? I guess the system should have a reservoir of bolts that it can reuse.
Also wonder how this would handle east coast winters, what with all the ice that gets caked on the undercarriage.
All in all I'm jealous of the engineers at Tesla who get to work on it :)
I wonder if technology from Better Place (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Better_Place) was in any way an inspiration? They had developed a battery swapping system in 2007.
Actually, it's the other way around. Shai Agassi (founder of Better Place) visited Tesla several years back, then went on to found Better Place after what he saw:
What are the chances of getting a standard battery size in these things? I'd be a shame for stations to need a hundred different batteries for every make and model.
I like Tesla a lot, but I also like honest marketing. 23 gallons (83 litres) tanked during demo gives much longer range than a full battery. Accumulated time spend at stations won't be shorter with Tesla's technology.
I think the swap is a great feature and there is no need to use questionable marketing tricks to sell it.
On the other hand, electric cars mostly get charged over night. The need for a battery swap or a stop for super charging should be much less frequent than the need to refill gas. It is hard to make a direct comparison.
It proves that there's not much difference to filling the tank with fuel. Without this method, you have to hang around forever while your battery charges. 90 seconds is the same as current vehicle usage. 90 minutes is not.
If they would've filmed the audi getting a fuel fillup adding the same range the battery swap would, it probably would still be a close race, getting out, swiping cards (entering PIN around here (Europe)) and getting back in.
Tesla claims 426 [1] km on a fully charged battery.
Audi claims to do that distance on 45 liters (so half a tank) (9.3 km to a Litre [2] average fuel consumption for a 3 liter petrol car)
Well, this wouldn't be fair either. Audi allows you to fill 90 litters, it's the advantage of the old technology. Fair comparison shouldn't artificially cripple the competition.
For me, battery swap in 90 seconds is a powerful enough and honest marketing message, no need for a comparison.
While I agree that it's on the face of it slightly dishonest to fill the audi to twice the range of the tesla I can think of 2 counter points;
The audi doesn't always have a full tank when you leave in the morning, unlike the tesla.
If Tesla ever make a drop in battery that has the audis range it's still a much faster stop.
Speed and range aside is also a much more pleasant experience to stay in the car.
Your point is what occurred to me during the video, though. It's fantastic technology, but the comparison is a bit flawed. However, they did get two batteries, which is still not 83 liters but it's pretty damn fast, and faster than "too long to wait", at any rate.
I have Audi A6 (older than in video, so my might be less efficient). I see that you can travel 300 miles with Tesla under perfect conditions (http://www.teslamotors.com/models/options). TDI Audi likes this under perfect condition can travel a little bit more than twice as much. In city mode Tesla might show better results than Audi (I would like to see real world results). So it looks like it is the same.
Again it might be more complicated. E.g. we might need to use Audi with better engine (bigger fuel consumption) to match Tesla. I have used TDI in my example and we might get completely different results with TFSI (since it is USA I guess we have TFSI Audi).
A better comparison would be the 2014 Audi R8 4.2 Coupe (Tiptronic), which does 0-60 mph in 4.4 seconds [1], although that's still slower than the Model S which does 0-60 in 4.2 seconds [2]. Of course, the R8 costs significantly more than the Model S in spite of the inferior performance.
This is really splitting hairs. They made a fun demo, and their whole position is to surpass the total experience of the gasoline car. I think they've shown that they're at least equal, which is an incredible accomplishment.
Nobody is excited that it's faster than a gas powered car, but rather that its now feasible to have "instant" refuel for an electric car. The comparison was just to make it more interesting to watch.
So instead of loading my battery i just swap it with a fully charged one and the thing is done. My old battery gets fully charged on site, and if someone else comes along he gets my old now fully charged battery.
Basically you never have to charge your Tesla again....
90 Seconds to "refill"... nice one
I worked on a college team that dealt with this exact challenge. We had an electric F1-style race car that required battery swaps half-way through the race. In our case, the car held 24 (? - I think) large heavy batteries from Electrosource (now out of business) that were configured in pairs, and slid in and out of the vehicle on sleds by a pit-crew. Heavy as hell, and a real challenge to do at a race - but functional. To see this whole thing automated is really fascinating on both a technical and personal level. Some companies are adding 9 seconds to video. This company is defining our future.
It's still exists (probably not for long). But recently after they failed publicly many critics claimed that battery swap model won't work, I guess that the guys in tesla disagree. Thus the compassion is required.
Needless to say this doesn't make much sense. There are so many confounding factors in the business of electric cars it's silly to take one company's failure as evidence that a particular subset of their technology is bad.
This is a super cool idea, and I love Tesla for just this sort of thing... but it's conjuring an amusing parallel to a Pony Express rider swapping horses.
Its amazing, Tesla will control both the energy usage of their car and the production. As opposed to the private oil companies and car manufacturers. This would mean they could get profits never dreamed of.
I wonder how the payment will work? Do you still have to get out of your car and swipe your card? It'd be cool if your car was linked to some online account that you could manage, so the whole thing can be done without stepping outside.
77 comments
[ 6.3 ms ] story [ 109 ms ] threadDon't know if they'll be okay with that, but it's an awesome possibility. That's thousands of miles with free (renewable) energy and fast.
Having to worry about the relative cost of your battery vs the one you are swapping for could make this a bit of a lottery. Also possibly bribing the attendant to give you a much newer one instead of the old creaky pack that no one wants.
Leasing seems like a good idea (pay X per year and you can use these stations and you'll always end up with a battery of a certain acceptable quality), according to the video though it does cost money.
The station could use a mix of solar power, wind, power grid and charge the batteries for probably much less $/kWh than gasoline in a car.
When you fill up a petrol / diesel engine you have one option: petrol / diesel.
When you fill up an Tesla (and other electric cars have different possibilities) you have:
- Recharging on your home power, which would cost whatever your home power costs but can only be used when you are OK charging over night - Recharging at one of those Tesla fast stations, which costs nothing, but takes 40min - Swapping a battery at a Tesla station, which takes 90 seconds and costs $??
The price then depends on the mix of those three strategies, which is determined by your usage (drive to and from work every day, it's your home power etc)
That might be worth it to save the PR of a burnt out tesla from a failed battery.
Sounds like when I get my propane tank filled. They don't care what condition it is in. I get a freshly painted filled one every time. And if I want, I can pay for a bigger one.
Edit: This is better quality: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlaQuKk9bFg
Edit2: An even better video: http://www.teslamotors.com/batteryswap (thnx jlgreco)
Edit: The enthusiasm seemed fake, not the actual tech being demonstrated, which seems straight-forward.
The expected lifespan of their batteries right now are about 7 years, but as anyone with a smartphone or laptop knows, battery life decreases rapidly over the life of the product. Tesla's cars were no exception to this and although most of the cars on the road are new and have not faced these issues yet, they were bound to crop up in the future. With battery swapping they've nipped this problem in the bud. Of course they'll charge you the difference for a newer battery but the benefits far outweigh the costs, and breeds stronger brand loyalty.
I was under the impression that these battery packs had so much monitoring and control technology built in, that would be very unlikely. Most batteries become lemons because on of the cells dies a death, becoming a short, which in turn drags down the other cells.
Tesla have a battery technology which is ment to be very advanced at managing each cell to prevent them catching fire, I would imagine they have very accurate wear level information on them too.
When battery technology is upgraded they will switch the entire stock for a new one. So there will be no anxiety for getting an old one.
Its as if the new iPhone came with a swappable battery but Apple kept it quiet till six months after launch.
Since the phone is entirely taken apart by specialized sites within hours of its availability, there's no way they would manage to hide a swappable battery.
it's like saying "i get the analogy [but it doesn't sound accurate to me]". fair sentiment but not constructive.
I wonder about the unbolting. What if one of the (what seemed like) dozen screwdriver bits fails? Screw the rest back on and fail the procedure? Also can the re-bolting fail, e.g. by dropping the bolt? Would your car end up with fewer and fewer bolts over time? I guess the system should have a reservoir of bolts that it can reuse.
Also wonder how this would handle east coast winters, what with all the ice that gets caked on the undercarriage.
All in all I'm jealous of the engineers at Tesla who get to work on it :)
This. I love my job, but this had me extremely jealous. This stuff is the future.
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/347005150860283905
I think the swap is a great feature and there is no need to use questionable marketing tricks to sell it.
So why did they make a direct comparison?
[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Model_S [2]http://www.autoweek.nl/auto/58469/audi-a8-l-30-tfsi-quattro
For me, battery swap in 90 seconds is a powerful enough and honest marketing message, no need for a comparison.
The audi doesn't always have a full tank when you leave in the morning, unlike the tesla. If Tesla ever make a drop in battery that has the audis range it's still a much faster stop.
Speed and range aside is also a much more pleasant experience to stay in the car.
Your point is what occurred to me during the video, though. It's fantastic technology, but the comparison is a bit flawed. However, they did get two batteries, which is still not 83 liters but it's pretty damn fast, and faster than "too long to wait", at any rate.
Again it might be more complicated. E.g. we might need to use Audi with better engine (bigger fuel consumption) to match Tesla. I have used TDI in my example and we might get completely different results with TFSI (since it is USA I guess we have TFSI Audi).
[1] http://www.zeroto60times.com/Audi-0-60-mph-Times.html [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Model_S#Options
It is however very encouraging for people worried about battery performance that you can get a new one pretty easily.