In my top 10, I have #Snowden, Cuba, Russia, Hong Kong, and Moscow. So for me Snowden is dominating as he currently has half of the trends. People are a little too quick to jump on the conspiracy theory bandwagon.
No, the question is "Is Snowden not being allowed to trend on Twitter"? Leading question. Also, within the post itself "Why is Snowden not trending" (grammar corrected by me) and the title "Proof Snowden should be trending" in all caps no less.
It's pretty clear the idea is to imply there's a conspiracy. Everything is a conspiracy.
I think that's exactly what's going on here. Snowden has been a popular topic on Twitter for days now, so it's likely that those other terms have had bigger volume changes recently.
25 comments
[ 5.7 ms ] story [ 65.6 ms ] threadhttp://i.imgur.com/ISYwKLD.png
Sites like Facebook and Twitter don't treat all users alike when it shows them what is trending.
It's pretty clear the idea is to imply there's a conspiracy. Everything is a conspiracy.
The algo for Twitter isn't straightforward, and may even have human checks to prevent gaming.
http://mashable.com/2010/05/14/twitter-improves-trending-top...