Startup Weekend Employees win Seattle without disclosing connection

16 points by anon_sourgrapes ↗ HN
A team composed primarily of Startup Weekend employees won the event in Seattle (evidence below) without disclosing their connection to the SW organization. While SW isn't intended to be a contest, the event concludes with celebrity judges awarding prizes. I believe the employees should have, at a minimum, announced who they were. Anyone else see this?

The team Red Ride came in 1st place at the Seattle event. For full disclosure, I worked on a different team that I thought could win. When we learned that Red Ride bested us, I congratulated them, accepted a friendly defeat, and genuinely was thankful to be part of the event. Last weekend I learned that one of the group members worked for SW. Curious, I started digging and discovered that 4 of the 6 Red Ride team members currently work for SW. Am I off base this is dishonest?

Red Ride homepage with demo: http://redride.squarespace.com/

SW blog post: http://seattle.startupweekend.org/2013/06/10/startup-weekend-seattle-was-awesome-heres-a-recap/

Redfin blog entry: http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2013/06/the-culmination-of-seattle-startup-weekend.html

Team:

Mohammed A - High School Student

Dan Cromer - Software Engineer at SW

Ben Gilbert - Global Facilitator at SW (and also Microsoft PM)

Chet Kittleson - NW Regional Manager at Up Global

Gabe Pelegrin - (Previous) Intern at SW and now contractor

Demi Wetzel - Culture Manager at Up Global

Note: Up Global is a SW subsidiary

4 comments

[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 16.2 ms ] thread
(comment deleted)
(comment deleted)
Of course they can't participate, let alone win.

By disclosing their names the OP is attempting to prove their claim.

The shame is not on the winning team. It is on the host for allowing their own to participate and win.

SW judges are not part of the organization, what kind of advantage would the team get by being members?