Medium: The medium that you can post in where it will get upvoted no matter what because the text is formatted to be pretty.
This Medium thing is getting out of hand. I think I've read possibly two or three articles that were legitimately good, informative, and offered new thoughts.
What's next? "Obama Goes 'All the Way' to Prove to Americans Just How Wrong the Bush Administration's War on Terror Is: NSA Scandal a Lesson in Absurdity".
I enjoy satire that strikes my subjective determinants of good satire. But what exactly is true satire? Do you mean satire that actually exposes and criticizes people's stupidity in the context of contemporary politics and culture? Cos if so, this post misses that mark.
I was unaware, before this post, that Medium even had the 'Pulling Pranks' section. This piece, however, strikes as less good than what I'd read in The Onion--and even that is more comedy than satire, most times.
Interesting example of how not having the title in the url hurts share-ability (even though that was originally done for seo). I pasted this link to friends, but had to provide a followup paste of the title.
Cute, yes. I'm honestly confused on why some others are complaining about the satirical nature of the piece. Seems just what some people might need at this point...
When I look at the multi-billion dollar NSA datacenter in Utah... I can't help but realize that the annual IT budget at Google or one of the big financial companies dwarfs that number, and does so every year.
Sorry, my point is that Google and Goldman Sachs et al spend several times the NSA's big multi-year project every single year.
As in, that datacenter ran the NSA ~$2 billion to build, but those companies are spending several times that every year on IT alone.
I'm reminded of the SEC whose yearly budget is several times smaller than even a single large banks IT budget.
I guess the NSA could have as astronomical black budget and is creating such an enormous amount of hidden demand that the market is that effected... but where's the datacenters holding that market-shifting amount of harddrives?
Even the one being built isn't as impressive as some of the Google/Facebook datacenters popping up, so it seems ridiculous to me that the US Gov is affecting HDD prices when Google/Facebook/Banks et al are not.
Good point - thank you. I suspect you are right in orders of magnitude - we will not really know the exact figures, but I suspect that Intel suddenly building a new plant to cope with demand that no-one can explain would get noticed by the financial analysts (well, the good ones anyway)
I've been using this service for a while now, but haven't been able to get a restore to work. My data comes back with large parts of it blacked out -- no idea why. Has anyone else been able to do a successful restore?
Not that I condone the NSA's practices in any way but it's interesting to think of how some of this data might serve as a historical record of our daily lives in the future.
Never before have there been such detailed records of public and private communications, websites, photos and who knows what else the NSA has flagged for "permanent storage." Archive.org could only dream of having so much ephemeral data and the capacity to store it.
a lot of my friends knew nothing about the NSA illegalities going on. if they read this, they probably wouldn't get that it's a joke. They'd start searching for the sign up page online... i need new friends
23 comments
[ 5.0 ms ] story [ 64.0 ms ] threadThis Medium thing is getting out of hand. I think I've read possibly two or three articles that were legitimately good, informative, and offered new thoughts.
What's next? "Obama Goes 'All the Way' to Prove to Americans Just How Wrong the Bush Administration's War on Terror Is: NSA Scandal a Lesson in Absurdity".
I was unaware, before this post, that Medium even had the 'Pulling Pranks' section. This piece, however, strikes as less good than what I'd read in The Onion--and even that is more comedy than satire, most times.
That beta program went live in 2006. http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2007/05/mark_klein_docu/
Apparently the NSA has been buying every platter available via unlimited taxpayer dollars.
Sounds like a joke but think about it...
As in, that datacenter ran the NSA ~$2 billion to build, but those companies are spending several times that every year on IT alone.
I'm reminded of the SEC whose yearly budget is several times smaller than even a single large banks IT budget.
I guess the NSA could have as astronomical black budget and is creating such an enormous amount of hidden demand that the market is that effected... but where's the datacenters holding that market-shifting amount of harddrives?
Even the one being built isn't as impressive as some of the Google/Facebook datacenters popping up, so it seems ridiculous to me that the US Gov is affecting HDD prices when Google/Facebook/Banks et al are not.
Never before have there been such detailed records of public and private communications, websites, photos and who knows what else the NSA has flagged for "permanent storage." Archive.org could only dream of having so much ephemeral data and the capacity to store it.
Jason Scott must have the most awkward boner right now...
Right. I know it's a joke, but this type of joke is starting to get on my nerves, considering how far from reality it is.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/07/06/1221694/-NSA-Reject...