It looks like the size of the node foo is determined by how many languages were influenced by foo, where "influence" does not include cautionary avoidance of foo's choices.
What programming languages are influenced by PHP? It really is a leaf node. This is not intrinsically a criticism. PHP arguably got a lot of libraries created that copies the way it did HTML templating (and I mean the core PHP here, not subsequent template libraries), but that probably wouldn't show here.
The flip side of this, incidentally, would be Haskell. Still pretty unusual to encounter in the wild, but it has influenced a lot of languages, and will continue to do so, possibly without ever being a top-tier success itself.
The size of the nodes are based on how much influence a language's design has had on later languages. PHP may have a lot of market share, but not a lot of languages have copied its features.
Seems like a popular thing to do, but probably time consuming (I probably have dozens more URLs but i'd have to search a lot of laptops, delicious, and... remember magnolia?)
This one is my personal favourite. My wife got a print made around a year ago for our anniversary. It's around 3m long so we don't actually have anywhere in the house we can hang it!
We should resize the balls based not on the languages they directly influenced, but on the transitive closure on the relation.
I was rather shocked to see ISWIM having such a small node, given it influenced basically the whole statically typed functional branch. Miranda got a correspondingly undeserved treatment.
Ideally, for the influence network, the size of the ball should correspond only to the influences that where innovations in the considered language. That may be too much to compute, though.
The last standard for C was 2011, it is entirely possible something from Java slipped in. Though I don't think Java has anything very unique in it. I would find it hard to say that yep that came from Java, and not some other language.
This page doesn't display for me. The top bar loads but lower is just a blank off-black page with no images or text. I enabled Javascript and saw no change. Clicking and right clicking anywhere below the address bar does nothing.
This is a cool visualization, but the data it is working from is pretty poor. A lot of the "influenced"s and "influenced by"s are pretty sketchy, and some are just plain nonsense. Also categorizing the languages is pretty iffy. I can't imagine any possible definition of "functional programming language" that includes lua, python and ruby, but does not include perl.
You're right the data set contains some questionable relations. Looks like DBpedia would have been a better and more reliable data source than Freebase.
JavaScript is an implementation of the standardized ECMAScript language, so technically it is not the same.
Freebase lists JavaScript as a dialect of ECMAScript and draws no influence relation between the two, you can see the data for ECMAScript here http://www.freebase.com/m/019syg
Never expected to see Dylan that big. Would be nice if this nifty language could get more attention. Has anybody here ever deployed something in Dylan?
It's because the public Freebase data that this visualization is based on is far from complete. For these programming languages and other things, it is as if most of the Wikipedia articles existed on the subject, but they contained nothing but the summary information. Have to start somewhere though, Freebase is a great start for structured information associations.
You can view the CFML entry here: http://www.freebase.com/m/03tsq7 and see that the 'Influenced by' and 'Influenced' associations are empty.
tmarthal makes a good point stating that Freebase data is not complete.
Moreover, looking at the language itself, I don't see anything that reminds me of Java.
That CFML runs on the JVM doesn't imply that the Java language is an influence from a theoretical computer science point of view. CFML also runs on .NET and Google App Engine, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ColdFusion_Markup_Language
41 comments
[ 5.4 ms ] story [ 103 ms ] threadThe flip side of this, incidentally, would be Haskell. Still pretty unusual to encounter in the wild, but it has influenced a lot of languages, and will continue to do so, possibly without ever being a top-tier success itself.
A better title for the page would be the one from the linked blog post, "How Programming Languages Influenced Each Other", at http://exploringdata.github.io/info/programming-languages-in....
http://blog.fogus.me/2012/05/02/a-functional-programming-inf...
http://blog.fogus.me/2012/06/07/an-object-oriented-influence...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3920619
http://www.info.ucl.ac.be/~pvr/paradigms.html
(the Dewey decimal system congeners) http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/2380000/2371137/ACMCCSTaxono...
http://james-iry.blogspot.com/2010/05/types-la-chart.html
http://blog.ouseful.info/2012/07/03/mapping-how-programming-...
__________
vaguely related: the Right Tools survey
http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~lmeyerov/projects/socioplt/viz...
http://www.storytotell.org/essays/juxtaposition.html
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/teaching/1011/ConceptsPL/ (they spend a lot of time studying ML and the state of the art language)
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/teaching/exams/pastpapers/t-Concepts... (pretty sure i'd flunk)
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/teaching/1213/DenotSem/
This one is my personal favourite. My wife got a print made around a year ago for our anniversary. It's around 3m long so we don't actually have anywhere in the house we can hang it!
http://web.archive.org/web/20130308095859/http://levenez.com...
I was rather shocked to see ISWIM having such a small node, given it influenced basically the whole statically typed functional branch. Miranda got a correspondingly undeserved treatment.
Ideally, for the influence network, the size of the ball should correspond only to the influences that where innovations in the considered language. That may be too much to compute, though.
This would be easier to read I think if the graph were directed and indicated it as such.
Someone has deleted this relation today, see http://www.freebase.com/m/07sbkfb?links&lang=en&filter=%2Fco...
Maybe a response to this thread. Think it's time to update the graph in the near future.
Latest chrome on fully-updated win8...
I wonder why ECMAScript and JavaScript are different? Isn't it a different name for the same programming language?
Freebase lists JavaScript as a dialect of ECMAScript and draws no influence relation between the two, you can see the data for ECMAScript here http://www.freebase.com/m/019syg
You can view the CFML entry here: http://www.freebase.com/m/03tsq7 and see that the 'Influenced by' and 'Influenced' associations are empty.
Moreover, looking at the language itself, I don't see anything that reminds me of Java.
That CFML runs on the JVM doesn't imply that the Java language is an influence from a theoretical computer science point of view. CFML also runs on .NET and Google App Engine, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ColdFusion_Markup_Language