States are likely to share its surveillance with the big corporations (who are much more powerful than elected politicians) to ensure that any union activists never ever gets a job again. It's a much better tool to maintain the status quo with than physical force. There is at least two dozen famous political philosophers who you can read for all the details.
8 comments
[ 2.5 ms ] story [ 27.3 ms ] threadhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kids_for_cash_scandal
correct me. your thought is that surveillance state enriches the pockets of those who run it by finding people to imprison?