Ask HN: Personality Assessments in the Workplace?
* He worries that the decision making process of the business could be short-circuited (perhaps only sub-consciously) to allow easier dismissal or acceptance of some suggestions or proposals based on the categorization of the person behind it, rather than on its own merits.
* Both of us having been raised in the households of psychologists are inclined to believe that personality inventories such as this are pseudoscientific. We're well acquainted with the Forer (or Barnum) Effect [2] and are not very willing to trust anything based entirely on self-evaluation of 45 or so questions.
* Even so, he feels that it's the psychological equivalent of being asked to drop trou in front of one's coworkers and is understandably uncomfortable about that.
* He seems to be the only one that has severe problems with this. Everyone else seems to be embracing it or at least accepting it as something that you just have to do. The later option feels intellectually dishonest to him, given the objections above.
Management is selling this as something that will enable better communication since people will be able to craft their interactions based on the other person's type. I've recommended that he ask for concrete examples of how they would tell him X if his type were Y vs. Z.
So, does anyone have any experience with these personality assessments in the workspace (or even specifically with DISC)? Any good recommendations for how to make these objections clear without becoming a pariah? Or are these concerns exaggerated somehow?
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DISC_assessment
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forer_Effect
4 comments
[ 4.7 ms ] story [ 22.3 ms ] threadYou have the right idea. I think there are some litigation possibilities for job-seekers who are screened out of jobs by psychological tests that haven't been SPECIFICALLY validated for the jobs in question, and an employer would be well advised not to use such tests.
I have taken personality assessments at work both as part of a management course and for another course in persuasion & influence. In both cases only I saw the results The point of the assessment was to understand your personality type and see how it could affect your behavior. Part of the class's purpose was also to determine someone's personality type so you could change your interaction with them. This was what we were being trained to do
Just giving someone this information with no knowledge of how to use it is a complete waste of time.
Do you think that kind of training makes the whole exercise productive?