[–] raymondh 12y ago ↗ Here's a follow-up Op-Ed piece: http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/12/opinion/puder-york-aol-firing/...
[–] hkmurakami 12y ago ↗ Well the positive part is that the CEO knew the employee's name. The negative is, well, obvious.
[–] aldous 12y ago ↗ You can listen to the actual call here: https://soundcloud.com/jim-romenesko/aol-ceo-tim-armstrong-8...
[–] lifeisstillgood 12y ago ↗ Thing is, the boss is seen as the asshole. Any attempt by the guy to sue for his job / lost earnings is likely to colour him negatively - taking it like a big boy (tweeting no comment from the bar) will probably make him more employable than not.But still - in front of a 1,000 people!
4 comments
[ 2517 ms ] story [ 703 ms ] threadBut still - in front of a 1,000 people!