Susan is the living proof of an amazing theory,
that any ordinary child can be turned into a
genius.
I have no problem with the idea that she's an amazing chess player, but one example is not "proof". It's evidence that adds to a growing body of evidence. It's fascinating. It's intriguing. It's raises the possibility of amazing advances.
But it's not "proof".
Oh how I hate the hyperbole of journalism. It seems that everything has to be biggest, fastest, strongest, "best", epic. I wish we could be given the facts and the story. That's interesting enough.
3 comments
[ 2.4 ms ] story [ 14.9 ms ] threadBut it's not "proof".
Oh how I hate the hyperbole of journalism. It seems that everything has to be biggest, fastest, strongest, "best", epic. I wish we could be given the facts and the story. That's interesting enough.