I'm partial, because I shot the video, but The Verge did a large feature/report on this back in April that I think explains both sides of this pretty well:
Emmmm... negative operant conditioning? There's no stimulus that's being removed depending on officer's behavior. In fact, I wouldn't call it operant conditioning at all - there's no new punishment or reward here, just increased certainty that both officers' and suspects' actions will be known and provable to third parties.
It seems like teachers and students could benefit from this as well. Teachers are often accused of being unfair or acting unprofessionally. Parents may not know who to believe when a teacher and a student flatly contradict one another.
Parents and children too! Also, couples. And football players--the refs can't be trusted. And my boss. We should probably just videotape everything, come to think of it.
18 comments
[ 3.5 ms ] story [ 47.2 ms ] threadhttp://www.theverge.com/2013/4/5/4162478/tasers-axon-flex-co...
"because I shot the video"
I've watched about 5 minutes and so far I see where you are interviewed but what part did you shoot the video on?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/14/nyregion/order-that-police...
Why is it that Microsoft's silly ranking system is much criticized, while this is one is being applauded ?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6266863
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Glass
Here's a more general result about these things:
https://www.google.com/search?q=small+wearabl%3Be+camcorder
http://www.taser.com/products/on-officer-video/axon-flex-on-...