Ask HN: What's up with Red Bull's pricing strategy?
Foreword: hopefully this relates to HN as it is business/price-setting related, which could be related to startups.
Well, a 4-pack of 250 ml Red Bull cans costs around five dollars (at Walmart). That is an average price of $1.25/can.
A 24-pack of 250 ml Red Bull cans costs around 42 dollars (http://www.amazon.com/Red-Bull-Energy-Drink-Sugarfree/dp/B000MTM0WK). That means 42/24 = $1.75/can.
At Walmart also, a 12 pack of 250 ml Red Bull cans costs 20 bucks. That is 20/12=1.66 per 250 ml can.
So, 1.25 (4-pack) < 1.66(12-pack) <1.75(24-pack).
The question is: WHY?
Shouldn't a properly run pricing strategy encourage customers to buy more, not discourage them? What's going on exactly?
12 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 24.7 ms ] threadhttp://journal.dedasys.com/2008/10/17/programmer-fuel
I think I paid 2 euro for that whole bottle. Wow was I wired that day...
Top Tip - stimulants like that (and I include coffee there) dont work twell at all: try orange juice instead, it will work much better and for longer. Follow it up with plenty of water (even minor dehydration makes you tired).
One glass of OJ every half hr plus lots of water will keep you awake longer than a can of Red Bull etc. :)
I used to drink this after heavy exercise -- I was never into sports drinks (amongst other things, the food coloring in them upsets my stomach). I found it very effective; it also stopped my stomach from cramping at the sudden introduction of a large quantity of water.
But when I get to 24 packs I'm in a whole different league and not thinking of an individual note. Now we're talking serious money.
Or perhaps Red Bull buyers can't do arithmetic.
2. Although larger quantities are usually cheaper by the unit, sometimes that is not true. Maybe the store is running low on inventory for the larger one, or high for the smaller one. Maybe they cut the price on the smaller one to act as a loss leader - I know drinks are often in this category.