[–] iancarroll 12y ago ↗ It would be really cool if the HDD's were not wiped, although it would be illegal to sell it if it had the leaked info (I think, not a lawyer here) [–] ics 12y ago ↗ They could've imaged them and then conveniently 're-leaked' it after the item was delivered. [–] DrStalker 12y ago ↗ I wonder if that would impact the value to a collector. To IT people it's just the exact same 1s and 0s, but to a collector would it be considered a restoration or would it be considered to be non-original data? [–] MacsHeadroom 12y ago ↗ I spouse it depends on the fidelity of said restoration. Of even one bit is on a different sector I would say it is not original. [–] [dead] MacsHeadroom 12y ago ↗ I spouse it depends on the fidelity of said restoration. Of even one bit is on a different sector I would say it is not original.
[–] ics 12y ago ↗ They could've imaged them and then conveniently 're-leaked' it after the item was delivered. [–] DrStalker 12y ago ↗ I wonder if that would impact the value to a collector. To IT people it's just the exact same 1s and 0s, but to a collector would it be considered a restoration or would it be considered to be non-original data? [–] MacsHeadroom 12y ago ↗ I spouse it depends on the fidelity of said restoration. Of even one bit is on a different sector I would say it is not original. [–] [dead] MacsHeadroom 12y ago ↗ I spouse it depends on the fidelity of said restoration. Of even one bit is on a different sector I would say it is not original.
[–] DrStalker 12y ago ↗ I wonder if that would impact the value to a collector. To IT people it's just the exact same 1s and 0s, but to a collector would it be considered a restoration or would it be considered to be non-original data? [–] MacsHeadroom 12y ago ↗ I spouse it depends on the fidelity of said restoration. Of even one bit is on a different sector I would say it is not original. [–] [dead] MacsHeadroom 12y ago ↗ I spouse it depends on the fidelity of said restoration. Of even one bit is on a different sector I would say it is not original.
[–] MacsHeadroom 12y ago ↗ I spouse it depends on the fidelity of said restoration. Of even one bit is on a different sector I would say it is not original.
[–] [dead] MacsHeadroom 12y ago ↗ I spouse it depends on the fidelity of said restoration. Of even one bit is on a different sector I would say it is not original.
[–] __alexs 12y ago ↗ "Bahnhof falsely claims that the server being auctioned was 'WikiLeaks primary web server'. It was not." - @wikileakshttps://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/374608602796785664 [–] seferphier 12y ago ↗ "primary web server" is the key word. Seems like they were clients though.We support RSF. We do not support Bahnhof exploiting the privacy and goodname of their clients for marketing purposes. - Wikileaks
[–] seferphier 12y ago ↗ "primary web server" is the key word. Seems like they were clients though.We support RSF. We do not support Bahnhof exploiting the privacy and goodname of their clients for marketing purposes. - Wikileaks
7 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 34.0 ms ] threadhttps://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/374608602796785664
We support RSF. We do not support Bahnhof exploiting the privacy and goodname of their clients for marketing purposes. - Wikileaks