[–] kzahel 12y ago ↗ Packaged this up based on https://github.com/SiPlus/WebQuake It was tough turning all the synchronous asset resource requests into async ones. Not sure why this is a necessity for Chrome Packaged apps for local resources anyway. :-( [–] MasterScrat 12y ago ↗ Is there any performance difference between the Chrome app and the original JS port? What are the benefits? [–] kzahel 12y ago ↗ Potentially, raw socket access. This could be a server as well as a client. But I need to do some more work porting it.
[–] MasterScrat 12y ago ↗ Is there any performance difference between the Chrome app and the original JS port? What are the benefits? [–] kzahel 12y ago ↗ Potentially, raw socket access. This could be a server as well as a client. But I need to do some more work porting it.
[–] kzahel 12y ago ↗ Potentially, raw socket access. This could be a server as well as a client. But I need to do some more work porting it.
6 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 31.2 ms ] thread