You must have never experienced the prices of printing services at UPS/Staples/Kinkos... $1.20+/per page for fax, $.50+/per B&W page for printing, etc.
A link to the detailed price sheet would still be appreciated by some users. If I'm trying to weigh the decision to buy matte/gloss thick/regular business cards, I don't want to have to cycle through the 4 options and mentally keep track of the relative pricing.
It seems like Lob is using a similar flat UI price calculator though they don't have the quantity sliders, which is apparently an oversight as a slider seems to make sense for settings like "number of pages". Their previous pricing was 50 cents per page plus 12 cents per extra page. A 100 page document is therefore $12.38 plus shipping. Under the new pricing the same 100 page document is $96 including shipping. Presumably shipping costs scale logarithmically with number of pages as the cost to ship a 100 page document shouldn't exceed $80, to put it mildly.
I also like Azure's use of the flat selection boxes which operate as radio buttons. You get to see all the options side-by-side as opposed to Lob's site where you have to click on each dropdown to see which options are available.
1. The ever popular: logo link on your blog should go to www.lob.com
2. Is there are reason all of these values can't be loaded on the page? I don't know if this is load related, but when I change an input option, I sometimes wait for over a second for the new price to appear. There's no reason I can think of to justify this, the switch should be nearly instant.
3. For me, this is much much better than the earlier version. But for some users, a price comparison might be helpful. As a secondary click, it might be nice to offer something like the old look (or a similar price comparison page).
I'm glad to see someone else feels the same way about logo links on blog.company.com pages. I have always been surprised they just redirect to "/" instead of the company homepage.
Does anyone know the reasoning for the trend? Is there some SEO benefit of this or is it really just oversight/becoming de facto standard?
Usually they're hosted separately (some vps and tumblr in this case). So it's just a matter of the blog using the default mapping for it's logo to the blog site. The blog is generally completely unaware it's psuedo-participating in a larger site configuration. Good from a security perspective, a bit of a hassle for admin'ing (hence this issue).
12 comments
[ 4.2 ms ] story [ 40.2 ms ] thread$0.96 for each document? If it was something like an Earnings Report for a startup's investors, that could be $80+ per report.
Does scaling never factor in, here? Bulk orders?
Edit: Got rid of a sentence that wasn't really part of their model.
http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/pricing/calculator/?scenar...
It seems like Lob is using a similar flat UI price calculator though they don't have the quantity sliders, which is apparently an oversight as a slider seems to make sense for settings like "number of pages". Their previous pricing was 50 cents per page plus 12 cents per extra page. A 100 page document is therefore $12.38 plus shipping. Under the new pricing the same 100 page document is $96 including shipping. Presumably shipping costs scale logarithmically with number of pages as the cost to ship a 100 page document shouldn't exceed $80, to put it mildly.
I also like Azure's use of the flat selection boxes which operate as radio buttons. You get to see all the options side-by-side as opposed to Lob's site where you have to click on each dropdown to see which options are available.
1. The ever popular: logo link on your blog should go to www.lob.com
2. Is there are reason all of these values can't be loaded on the page? I don't know if this is load related, but when I change an input option, I sometimes wait for over a second for the new price to appear. There's no reason I can think of to justify this, the switch should be nearly instant.
3. For me, this is much much better than the earlier version. But for some users, a price comparison might be helpful. As a secondary click, it might be nice to offer something like the old look (or a similar price comparison page).
[Formatting edit]
Does anyone know the reasoning for the trend? Is there some SEO benefit of this or is it really just oversight/becoming de facto standard?