3 comments

[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 19.3 ms ] thread
This discussion pops up a lot, and it's referenced here so:

Is there a FAQ or something that succinctly explains why "jokes" are misogyny, because it's pretty obvious that there's a lot of confusion between the dictionary definition of this word and how people are using it.

Why exactly would I assume that cryptography stewarded by this particular person would be "state of the art"? If he's got someone else designing the crypto, why isn't their name part of the marketing of the product?