4 comments

[ 2.3 ms ] story [ 6.8 ms ] thread
nitpick : please use a more contrasting color combo.

edit : You know what--keep the poor contrast, that way no one can read it.

"He previously posted on 4chan, a popular internet forum often used for trading child pornography,"

I'm all for condemning racist and paedophiles, but what a load of garbage that the author chose to explain 4chan that way.

(comment deleted)
I actually think the blog is more interesting than the article itself, and worth commenting.

See their first post (excerpt):

  Who runs this site?
  We are a group of concerned Americans who feel the Tox project 
  poses a danger to society in several ways. We come from a variety 
  of backgrounds and both sides of the political spectrum. We believe 
  in the US constitution and all its laws.
and

  Tox is dangerous in several ways: If finished per its developers' claims, 
  Tox is only interesting to criminals.
"If finished per its developers' claims, Tox is only interesting to criminals. In its current state, Tox is nothing but a scam that provides no privacy. It is, however, a moneymaker for its developers."

?