[–] fyolnish 13y ago ↗ tldr: He's writing a ruby implementation in Python, that he claims is faster. But there are no benchmarks to back that up. [–] pkroll 13y ago ↗ Well, RPython, which is not quite the same thing. And aside from the lack of benchmarks, http://docs.topazruby.com/en/latest/current-status/ says it's "extremely incomplete" which is generally where "fast Ruby" implementations exist. [–] ksec 13y ago ↗ The Benchmarks from Oracle on One VM to Rule it All has Topaz Numbers there.Basically MRI <JRuby <Topaz <New Oracle SVM,And the above line has roughly 20 - 50 times performance difference in benchmarks.
[–] pkroll 13y ago ↗ Well, RPython, which is not quite the same thing. And aside from the lack of benchmarks, http://docs.topazruby.com/en/latest/current-status/ says it's "extremely incomplete" which is generally where "fast Ruby" implementations exist.
[–] ksec 13y ago ↗ The Benchmarks from Oracle on One VM to Rule it All has Topaz Numbers there.Basically MRI <JRuby <Topaz <New Oracle SVM,And the above line has roughly 20 - 50 times performance difference in benchmarks.
3 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 17.8 ms ] threadBasically MRI <JRuby <Topaz <New Oracle SVM,
And the above line has roughly 20 - 50 times performance difference in benchmarks.