"If one wanted to buy you in three months, what's the lowest offer you'd take?" (huh?)
I'd like to ask PG: Is this assuming things are going fantastically well, or not so well but not so badly that we don't at least have a potential buyer?
Clearly the second option would result in the lower number, in which case we're basically valuing our time and sacrifice against a scheme that did ok but not great, and telling YC what we think their salvage value might be.
Giving a high-end 3 months upside potential is the other possibility.
Or should I just give a number for both?
Maybe I don't understand the point of this question?
18 comments
[ 4.6 ms ] story [ 59.5 ms ] threadIf he'd applied to YC, Mark Zuckerberg would probably have answered differently than the Reddit guys, for example.
A former YC founder told me to just put down a number in the 5-10 million range.
It's probably in your favor that you're even considering different situations under which you would sell the company.
>In the millions. However, if we got an offer in the millions after three months it would make great economic sense to wait another nine months for a better offer.
on another note, your company's valuation is determined by what people are willing to pay :)
So, I don't think any one question is going to kill your chances. Show that you know how to think about the value of your business idea, that you have the capacity to build your idea, and that you are willing to build it. Everything else is gravy. I suspect clear and concise sentences go very far, as well.
The site I'm working on is more niche than broad, so my sale goal is N x 2 x 10^6.
However, I think that I am strange in really hoping my site actually generates cashflow once it's up and going, and I don't have to constantly look for funding or an acquirer.