I'm curious if people from rich family background go to learn programming and computer science or most CS / programmers come from middle class or lower.
No, it would be a waste of time. When you have the money you can hire a programmer to do it better and faster than you can ever do it. Programming is a skill that takes many years to become really good at.
Of course "most" programmers come from middle class or lower, as "most" people are probably in your definition of middle/lower class.
What's your definition of "rich"?
If you consider "rich" to be in excess of $100 million net worth, and private jets and stuff like that, then ya, maybe @nick2 is right.
If you consider "rich" to be in excess of $200k/year salary, and up to $10 million net worth... guessing there isn't a huge trend one way or the other. But the general bias is probably towards the middle/upper class vs people who are in the very lower class. Since having some resources (internet, computer, education) is needed.
So was Mark Zuckerberg. If you don't come from a well-to-do family its hard to turn down a million dollars for a side project.
Look at the founders of Google, who came from middle class families, and would have been more than happy to sell Google in the early days for even 1 million dollars.
I'm very curious if Gates'/Ellison's/Allen's sons (or any of this guys that made fortune with computer programming/software) know about computer programming. Sometime ago I've read (a sorry, but I don't remember where) that Gates' sons could to use the computer about two hour per day only.
I believe they do as long as it makes them understand the world and business they are in, not for becoming a programmer unless thats what they want to do.
Upper middle class kid here. I've made a throwaway to avoid blacklisting, because money does weird things to everyone.
Sure, I'm not in the 1%. But I'm from a well off family. In my room alone I have 6 computers: a Macbook Air, an iMac, a high-end Ultrabook, two Windows 8 tablets, and a low-end HP Notebook running Ubuntu. Also a Raspberry Pi and an Arduino.
I love programming. It isn't taught at my high school, so I have taught myself since 3rd grade by reading textbooks on my own. I'd list my GitHub, but as I said I don't want to be blacklisted.
As a middle-class father of teenagers, I've looked into game development summer camps (which sell out pretty quickly each season) and sadly concluded that these are primarily a rich kid indulgence. Obviously, most middle class families can't afford the fees but they'd be pocket change to wealthy families and provide a place to send Johnny or Jane while Mom and Dad go on European holiday.
The bitter irony of these programs is that while they probably represent merely "fun, free time" for rich kids, the same skills could be life-changing for average or poor kids.
Also curious about this topic but not much useful info will come from this thread, it will be anecdotal at best.
My anecdote: grew up poor, started programming to build my own games as my family couldn't afford new hardware. Built systems out of scavenged parts and learned a lot about code optimization. Dev is the key factor that lifted me from poverty in suburban England to a middle class life in NYC (and hopefully beyond, should luck pan out).
Most of my peers appear to be from middle/upper middle class backgrounds, but the (faux?) egalitarianism of tech would suggest that the sires of the genuinely rich wouldn't flaunt it as everyone in this industry "made their own success", right? ;)
13 comments
[ 4.4 ms ] story [ 42.7 ms ] threadOf course "most" programmers come from middle class or lower, as "most" people are probably in your definition of middle/lower class.
What's your definition of "rich"?
If you consider "rich" to be in excess of $100 million net worth, and private jets and stuff like that, then ya, maybe @nick2 is right.
If you consider "rich" to be in excess of $200k/year salary, and up to $10 million net worth... guessing there isn't a huge trend one way or the other. But the general bias is probably towards the middle/upper class vs people who are in the very lower class. Since having some resources (internet, computer, education) is needed.
Look at the founders of Google, who came from middle class families, and would have been more than happy to sell Google in the early days for even 1 million dollars.
Sure, I'm not in the 1%. But I'm from a well off family. In my room alone I have 6 computers: a Macbook Air, an iMac, a high-end Ultrabook, two Windows 8 tablets, and a low-end HP Notebook running Ubuntu. Also a Raspberry Pi and an Arduino.
I love programming. It isn't taught at my high school, so I have taught myself since 3rd grade by reading textbooks on my own. I'd list my GitHub, but as I said I don't want to be blacklisted.
So yes, I code. And I enjoy it.
Digital Media Academy : http://www.digitalmediaacademy.org/ * $1000-$2000 1 or 2-week course
iD Gaming Academy : http://www.internaldrive.com/idga/ * $3,599-$3,799 2-week course
The bitter irony of these programs is that while they probably represent merely "fun, free time" for rich kids, the same skills could be life-changing for average or poor kids.
My anecdote: grew up poor, started programming to build my own games as my family couldn't afford new hardware. Built systems out of scavenged parts and learned a lot about code optimization. Dev is the key factor that lifted me from poverty in suburban England to a middle class life in NYC (and hopefully beyond, should luck pan out).
Most of my peers appear to be from middle/upper middle class backgrounds, but the (faux?) egalitarianism of tech would suggest that the sires of the genuinely rich wouldn't flaunt it as everyone in this industry "made their own success", right? ;)