This is brilliant, and brings to mind Marco Arment's excellent Bugshot[1] for iOS. Of course, this won't work for more complex interaction bugs, but perhaps support for animated GIFs could be added?
Edit: just seen the pricing, $19/mo seems a bit steep, and there's no free tier, just a trial. Shame. They're positioning it as an integrated bug reporting solution, but I think it would get more adoption as an atomic tool with more approachable pricing.
What concerns me more than the pricing is their monthly limits. $99/m can only allow 300 feedback forms collected in each month. That is only 10 per day
The demo didn't work for me, Firefox 24.0/Windows.
It just greyed out the screen, I could draw but I had no tool icons to do anything with it. The only way I could recover the page was to resize the window.
Where is the value-add to convince me or my QA team that this is worth $ compared to the current practice of using browser extensions (like Awesome Screenshot for Chrome) to take screengrabs and annotate them? Yes, our method is lacking the interface to bug trackers, but we don't use any of those bug trackers anyway, so no loss.
Your QA doesn't have to install an extension. Imagine cross-browser or cross-device testing (desktop, mobile, even IE!) or imagine the feedback comes from your (development) customers. Usually, you'll get unstructured emails with near-zero screenshots / meta information.
Another use case of our customers: in-app bugtracking - they work day by day in the web app and can submit bug reports or feature ideas while they are working. Because of that, many papercuts can be fixed which would not have been reported normally.
>Visual Bug Tracking: Understand what your user's mean!
This is petty, but such an obvious misspelling/typo
means I move on. If you can't polish copy details on the landing page, the product probably isn't polished either.
Oh please. Give me a break. I have read typo and grammar errors on well published papers and those are the big guys in their fields. I am sure their products aren't polished either.
Just because it's done doesn't mean it's OK. It's one of the quickest ways to lose credibility with potential customers and one of the easiest things to check for.
It is forgivable. You sound just like your username: strict. You have to be able to be flexible. Bugs every day in this world. Little forgiveness is what the world needs. Don't be so judgmental. Missing ' in a tagline is not a big deal at all.
I'd love to use this service but as a freelancer who would get much more than 300 feedbacks a month the pricing schema seems completely off point and makes it impossible for me to use.
I really hate companies that have tiered pricing, it's unfair to those who don't use all of their allocated tier and unfair to those who need much more and are fine with paying if I don't need to contact them, just implement a way for me to pay-per-feedback or something.
25 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 28.9 ms ] threadEdit: just seen the pricing, $19/mo seems a bit steep, and there's no free tier, just a trial. Shame. They're positioning it as an integrated bug reporting solution, but I think it would get more adoption as an atomic tool with more approachable pricing.
[1]: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/bugshot/id669858907?mt=8
http://i.imgur.com/YEdsPr7.jpg
It just greyed out the screen, I could draw but I had no tool icons to do anything with it. The only way I could recover the page was to resize the window.
This is petty, but such an obvious misspelling/typo means I move on. If you can't polish copy details on the landing page, the product probably isn't polished either.
Regardless, prompt attention to feedback is appreciated and a sign of a successful business. Like the design otherwise, best of luck.
I really hate companies that have tiered pricing, it's unfair to those who don't use all of their allocated tier and unfair to those who need much more and are fine with paying if I don't need to contact them, just implement a way for me to pay-per-feedback or something.