[–] gruseom 17y ago ↗ The original article is more informative:http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2008/11/major_s... [–] wmeredith 17y ago ↗ Indeed. This is also over a year old and the drop-off lasted less than 24 hours. (Additionally and ironically; flagged for blog spam.)
[–] wmeredith 17y ago ↗ Indeed. This is also over a year old and the drop-off lasted less than 24 hours. (Additionally and ironically; flagged for blog spam.)
[–] wglb 17y ago ↗ Isn't spam now back up to where it was before? [–] TallGuyShort 17y ago ↗ This graph was posted in the comments:http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamweekI see the big dip on Tuesday, but it's quite brief. I don't see a longer-term difference... [–] joshwa 17y ago ↗ This graph is more illustrative:http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamyear [–] schnalle 17y ago ↗ "posted Nov 12th 2008 6:38pm"
[–] TallGuyShort 17y ago ↗ This graph was posted in the comments:http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamweekI see the big dip on Tuesday, but it's quite brief. I don't see a longer-term difference... [–] joshwa 17y ago ↗ This graph is more illustrative:http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamyear
8 comments
[ 11.2 ms ] story [ 189 ms ] threadhttp://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2008/11/major_s...
http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamweek
I see the big dip on Tuesday, but it's quite brief. I don't see a longer-term difference...
http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamyear