Ask HN: Why are you still sharing content as PDFs?
Why are people still sharing content as pdf instead of html pages?
I am voracious reader of online content, but I generally dont read content on websites but rather through apps like Pocket and Instapaper. Every once in a while I find a piece of content that I want to read that is only available as a pdf and doesnt work through these apps. Is it still needed? Is there a benefit to the approach I am missing? Copy protection / portability?
example user mentions a podcast https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6662939 I find it and transcript is only available as pdf. http://ilovemarketing.com/episode-024-the-one-with-more-cheese-and-less-whiskers/
10 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 32.0 ms ] threadAnother reason: for whatever reason, if you're selling your content a PDF has more intrinsic value for the end customer. It becomes "a thing" instead of just being "content that should be free". It's very odd. People like the idea of owning digital goods, but only as long as they can download them and store them on their own hard drive.
Perfect description. Word and other formats feel like a draft. By having established a legacy of making finished PDFs hard to edit without, say, a full licensed version of Acrobat, it got people into the mindset that it was the go to press format.
You can be sure formatting will be fine. I once bought a Kindle ebook that had lots of code samples. Even when reading on my laptop with a large screen spacing was really bad. (Though safari books online handles this well in HTML.
Companies also tend to like things as .PDFs for archiving.
In all seriousness, the only reason you should be using PDFs is if the exact presentation must be preserves. Basically, this means any documents which contain maths or figures or tables would be best constructed in TeX and turned into PDFs, so that you can control the exact presentation.
For anything else I strongly recommend people just use HTML! (Or something which can be turned into HTML.)