Ask HN: How bad is the decision to work as a co-founder without legal contracts?
Hi all, this has been biting me a bit.
I've been invited to be a coder ( me + 2 coders and the organizer as ux ) to a startup, and was verbally promised a share of the revenue ( equal ). The organizer is not a close-friend, but merely someone who invites me because I suited the capabilities.
The idea is quite nice, not era-shifting though, and looks like there are going to be a lot to learn side-by-side, too : lega, marketing, business stuffs I don't know and never did before. However, all of these said future have no legal contracts until the formal registration of the company ( where names are formally noted, and registered to the government ), which is when revenues start pumping in.
The startup requires devotion other than my full-time day job, which I can use to do other stuffs ( meaningful and constructive ). It's going to be a year or so. I am thinking without a legal contract guaranteeing the benefits of each member, it can be dangerous to me ( and the other memebrs ), as "coders are expendable". There will be no salary.
My best case : Idea goes live and launches. Profits come in, I get my shares. I learnt how to do business. And promising future.
Best case out of bad cases : Idea goes live and launches. Died soon, I get my shares. I learnt how to do business.
Bad case : Idea dies halfway. Initial projection of time dragged too much. I learnt how to do business, albeit at a cost of time and more.
My worst case : Idea goes live. Initial projection of time dragged. But the organizer plays dishonesty and kicks me / other coders out, taking the whole share.
My questions :
1. Without the legal contract, how bad will things be if things blow up?
2. From past experiences of you, do people really respect verbal agreements?
3. Could there be any legal issues on me?
4. What could I do without a written agreement witnessed by a lawyer?
5. What could I do without an informal written agreement ( no lawyers involved )?
I understand there is a risk to take, and I also understand that "getting excited by the future" could be the height of a folly, but then I might be wrong. I also understand that despite the risk, this failing in most cases could teach me a good deal of lesson, too.
I appreciate any smart advice from you all experienced people.
Thank you very much.
[edited linebreaks of questions.]
20 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 59.2 ms ] threadFrom your standpoint, without proper documentation: (1) your biggest risk is getting ripped off for your labor; (2) you would have leverage in that any IP you would develop would belong to you and not to the company until you assigned it by formal documentation; (3) if you did get ripped off, you could bring a legal claim either for breach of a verbal agreement or for fraud; (4) such claims are difficult and expensive to bring and thus not practical in most cases; (5) a lawsuit almost always leaves you worse off than does almost any other alternative; (6) therefore, get some reasonable understanding up front of what you can expect to get from your efforts and use at least informal means to document it.
You may or may not learn from this experience, depending on whether the other founders bring you into their inner circle.
Finally, I have seen this pattern work just fine very often in spite of the legal risks. In most of the good cases, though, the founders know each other and have a relationship. The cases where most of the problems arise are ones in which the founders do not previously know each other (what might be called opportunistic teaming). From your description, and from the length of time they want you to do work without documentation, I would say your case falls in the higher-risk category. Your legal downside would very likely be limited to losing your labor while getting cheated of any promised equity. The company has the greater legal downside from failing to document, mostly relating to its IP.
I have a question I hope you may help answer. Roughly how many percentile in the number of startup cases do have formal legal documentation?
It is all cost/benefit, though. What does it cost to use lawyers? What is at stake? In my experience, it is the rare case where founders will sink large resources into something (significant labor, etc.) without some legal documentation.
Some do LegalZoom, but this has its own problems (failure to use restricted stock and to capture IP being the most important). I have written about this elsewhere.
My general guideline: if a startup has real prospects, it is usually worth investing in legal resources as soon as practicable, even if it means doing a deferred-fee deal with the lawyers. The initial setup itself is usually not that expensive. At the very least, you should go as a team to a qualified lawyer for an initial meeting to get advice about the process - then you will have a basis to make a more informed decision.
I will incorporate your suggestions and guideline into my decision. Thank you!
Thanks keltecp11. I am still thinking.
In my experience? Pretty bad... A better financial decision is to make a bet with the other coders. $2000 says he doesn't pay up.
More likely - organizer claims that your contribution is worth significantly less than you think that it is. (Perhaps he'll say something along the lines of "it was my great idea and organization while anyone could have done what you did".) You get a pittance and walk away, mad. On the way out, you'll sign over what you did.
Point out that you own everything that you create until there's a formal agreement otherwise and that that will make it impossible to get investment. The organizer will probably then decide that such a formal agreement is necessary. At that point, you point out that said formal agreement needs to include "consideration" for you. (It actually doesn't, but ....)
But the legal uncertainty would discourage investment.
Where is this presumption?
Copyright and patent law in the US specifically says that folks earn what they make outside of an explicit agreement otherwise. (And, that agreement can be for no pay - you can work for free.)
BTW - What company? He said that it was unregistered.
In short, I probably shouldn't have asked what company. Or, I should have been more paranoid and asked if there's actually a legal entity and it's just not writing any contracts with the help.
Otherwise, don't start working until the registration is complete.
I'm not allowed to talk (much) about it, but the short version is: been there, done that, to the tune of several million bucks that are currently missing from my pocket.
So, the answers to your questions (in order):
1) Worse than you can imagine.
2) Some do, but not all. Which means, to be safe, you have to pretend no one does.
3) Yes, undoubtedly. There's only two ways to find out: a) lawyer up, or b) roll the dice, and pay the price. I'd strongly recommend the former.
4) Not much. You might get lucky and draft an agreement that is as good as a lawyer would write. You might also get hit by a meteor made out of twenty-dollar-bills. I wouldn't count on either.
5) Diddley-squat, if your goal is to protect yourself.
To sum up: pay the damn lawyer. View the expense as something like health insurance-- it's a pain in the ass to pay for it when you don't need it, but it's a zillion times worse to really need it and not have paid for it.
thanks. I think I need to re-consider again very very seriously.
At the very very least, get a specific list of deliverables, your profit share percentage, and his ownership rights to your code on paper, then get him to sign and date it. Be as explicit about everything as possible. Not being able to afford a lawyer is no excuse for not getting your general agreement on paper.
If he resists, remind him that the paperwork protects him as much as it protects you.
No, I don't take it rude. It's ok. Thanks.
All of the involved people are Chinese in China. I am sure the law differs but the actual smarts might share common attributes.