6 comments

[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 29.5 ms ] thread
I've held as a belief it would raise prices - because more more would become available to basic consumers and would be spent on basic consumption.

Can such a hypothesis be proven false?

I would predict that such inflation would be short lived. On a basic income, the majority of money would be spent on mostly basic products, with the occasional, but rare luxury. This would suggest a lot more dollars chasing few goods, but not the type of goods where the marginal cost of production is high. Any initial inflation would therefore be eroded by increased commoditification of basic products.
I don't think this impact would be large at all for industries that approximate perfect competition like raw food. Price of such goods should approximate marginal cost. Marginal cost would only increase if workers in these industries could now demand higher wages than before, which doesn't seem likely to me unless the basic income is very high. Do you expect their wages to rise? If anything, I would hope basic income would go side-by-side with abolishing minimum wage, which could decrease the price of such goods.

You may very well be right for some other goods, but food is a good example where production can scale up but is essentially a no-margin industry. And it's a very important example in the context of eliminating poverty.

Of course, the only way to prove it is to try it out and see :)

> Compounding the problem would be upward pressure on housing prices that a UBI may spur.

Easy housing loans with low deposits make house prices go up. A universal basic income would make rents go up.

A more optimistic prediction is that a UBI would encourage the development of more low-income housing.
A much smarter proposal also comes from Switzerland: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eidgen%C3%B6ssische_Volksinitia... . In Switzerland people will vote this month about a proposal, that companies should not be allowed to pay their highest earning employee more than 12 times the amount they pay their lowest earning employee. This would decrease the income gap, but doesn't force minimum or maximum wages on a company.