Outlook.com DNS records disappeared (outlook.com)
:-(
something went wrong
Sorry, we can't get that information right now. Please try again later. If the problem continues, contact your helpdesk<p>---<p>dig outlook.com<p>; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> outlook.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 62938
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0<p>;; QUESTION SECTION:
;outlook.com. IN A<p>;; Query time: 33 msec
;; SERVER: 10.51.20.100#53(10.51.20.100)
;; WHEN: Fri Nov 22 09:37:02 2013
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 29
96 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 133 ms ] threadEdit: Also, the Xbox One is launching tonight so if their Live servers are down...it won't be pretty.
What a bad time for this to happen for Microsoft. It's almost too badly timed for it to be a coincidence, if I were an attacker with access to Microsoft's DNS' this would be the perfect time to launch an attack.
Yup, it's pretty broken, though it is still up some places.
Outlook.com:
https://www.whatsmydns.net/#A/outlook.comPretty much all sites are down for me (Germany).
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6778272
http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msusa/en_US/cat/Scroogle...
This is so embarrassing.
Oh wait:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/news/press/2013/oct13/10-24fy...
REDMOND, Wash. — October 24, 2013 — Microsoft Corp. today announced revenue of $18.53 billion for the quarter ended September 30, 2013. Gross margin, operating income, net income, and diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $13.42 billion, $6.33 billion, $5.24 billion, and $0.62 per share.
I chuckle at how a lot of anti-MS zealots are absolutely mystified at how non-anti-MS simply can possibly be so delusional.
But selling merchandise? Come on, really! Is there at least one person in the world who could use these items and make it seem like they are making a fair point?
Google is a company who derives about 99% of its revenue directly from its advertising business, of which utilizing user data from free services is the crux of the data-based approach that drives their success.
It seems like false equivalence to me. Same reason why I trust Apple way more than Google with data. Because Apple makes all their money on the hardware, not on the future use of your data for advertising purposes.
Commercials sometimes, sure, but not wearable merchandise. I think it makes Microsoft seem quite petty, especially since they're trying to coin a whole new word out of it ("Scroogled").
This about sums up how I feel about Azure: http://i.imgur.com/ESakkWk.png