[–] bagels 12y ago ↗ This page looks the same as it did a few months ago, is there something new this time?(https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6241544)
[–] TylerE 12y ago ↗ "designed from the ground up to blend the best of an SUV with the benefits of a minivan" - yet incapable of carrying either largish cargo or more than 4.5 adults. [–] raldi 12y ago ↗ They claim it seats seven and has two trunks. Do you dispute that? [–] TylerE 12y ago ↗ It doesn't seat 7 adults. Look at that roofline! I doubt any one over about 4' 8" would be comfortable in that 3rd row.
[–] raldi 12y ago ↗ They claim it seats seven and has two trunks. Do you dispute that? [–] TylerE 12y ago ↗ It doesn't seat 7 adults. Look at that roofline! I doubt any one over about 4' 8" would be comfortable in that 3rd row.
[–] TylerE 12y ago ↗ It doesn't seat 7 adults. Look at that roofline! I doubt any one over about 4' 8" would be comfortable in that 3rd row.
[–] infogulch 12y ago ↗ Too bad they passed up on the next lexicographical model name.I think a "Tesla Model T" would have been both ironic and a bit prophetic. Perhaps they just wanted to avoid the inevitable constant jokes.
5 comments
[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 22.5 ms ] thread(https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6241544)
I think a "Tesla Model T" would have been both ironic and a bit prophetic. Perhaps they just wanted to avoid the inevitable constant jokes.