Ask HN: Why is Linkedin such a low quality?
It is supposed to be a professional network, but the quality is lower then my facebook feed.
Meaning the 'Pulse' which shares outdated or irrelevant (x tips to y) stories, updates, the timeline which is filled with absolutely useless/annoying content. The groups who are owned are taken over by recruiters/spam.
I guess its only real power is to be connected with (previous) colleagues and to see what they're up to. And ofcourse the job postings for companies (although I would never look for a job starting on Linkedin..)
Am I the only one?
6 comments
[ 3.9 ms ] story [ 28.8 ms ] threadIn fact, this excellent column [1] states this viewpoint (and some reasons behind the problem) better than I ever could.
[1] www.thebaffler.com/past/all_linkedin_with_nowhere_to_go
I've been sharing 1 article a day for the past 6 months, in addition to responding to group questions. Since my objective is branding, it's not easy to quantify results. But anecdotally, some contacts have mentioned to me that they enjoy what I've been sharing.
I would find original content, infrequently posted and of decent quality, much more impressive.
I guess like so many other things this can be done well, or done badly, and there's a skill in doing it well.
I think that's the crux of the issue.