11 comments

[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 33.5 ms ] thread
An instance where headline should be corrected (currently: "SeatGeek Acquires Better-Funded Competitor FanSnap").

FanSnap strikes me as a better name.

Why?
The double "e" sound. SeatGeek, when said quickly, can sound like SeeGee. I've had plenty of conversations where I talk about SeatGeek for the first time and I have to repeat the name.
I agree. FanSnap is by far the better sounding name.
"Geek" doesn't belong in mass market product name, IMO. And FanSnap is a plain ole decent name.
Seemed to work out alright for geeksquad.
Hard to say. But it makes a lot more sense for that service.
I went to the article imagining the worst, due to the overly ill-spirited title on HN "SeatGeek Acquires Better-Funded Competitor FanSnap".

Fortunately they only mention the funding in regards to them acquired co. having funding before SeatGeek started. Which is a testament to hard work, and not needing to be the first to launch a similar idea to succeed.

The title needs to be changed on HN though.

This is awesome. Congrats to the SeatGeek team.
Likewise, congrats to Jack, Russ, et al.