Paul Graham interview in The Information (theinformation.com) 22 points by radicaldreamer 12y ago ↗ HN
[–] shalalala 12y ago ↗ Why post this if you need to subscribe to read it??? [–] shawndumas 12y ago ↗ not the op but it's prob because the gawker version is doa'ed [–] mllerustad 12y ago ↗ Yeah, Gawker's summary is insta-banned.Apparently Hacker News is not the place to discuss Paul Graham saying intellectually lazy, ignorant, sexist things. Who would have thought! [–] shawndumas 12y ago ↗ I think it's more that all of gawker's content is doa'ed [–] britta 12y ago ↗ Valleywag posts have been automatically killed since 2008: http://techcrunch.com/2008/04/11/hacker-news-considers-banni...
[–] mllerustad 12y ago ↗ Yeah, Gawker's summary is insta-banned.Apparently Hacker News is not the place to discuss Paul Graham saying intellectually lazy, ignorant, sexist things. Who would have thought! [–] shawndumas 12y ago ↗ I think it's more that all of gawker's content is doa'ed [–] britta 12y ago ↗ Valleywag posts have been automatically killed since 2008: http://techcrunch.com/2008/04/11/hacker-news-considers-banni...
[–] britta 12y ago ↗ Valleywag posts have been automatically killed since 2008: http://techcrunch.com/2008/04/11/hacker-news-considers-banni...
[–] jd0 12y ago ↗ If you don't want to fork over the $400 to pass the paywall and view this article, check out vallywag's summation:http://valleywag.gawker.com/paul-graham-says-women-havent-be...
6 comments
[ 2.5 ms ] story [ 25.8 ms ] threadApparently Hacker News is not the place to discuss Paul Graham saying intellectually lazy, ignorant, sexist things. Who would have thought!
http://valleywag.gawker.com/paul-graham-says-women-havent-be...