Poll: Do you own a working television?
At the start of 2009 by accident rather than design I stopped having a television at home. Since then I've failed to buy a new one and I've been happy with the overall experience. A handful of times I've watched some old program using the BBC iPlayer, but haven't felt the need for a permanent TV.
I'm wondering what percentage of of HN people don't have a television.
92 comments
[ 2.5 ms ] story [ 197 ms ] threadIt's funny though, because people around will be talking about some soap or sports event and I'll literally have no idea what they are talking about.
I'll admit to spending more time in front of my computer than most people spend in front of their tv...
For watching movies, you can't beat a good, large-screen television (or a projector I suppose) in a comfortable room.
Also, in the UK we have a reasonable (well, fairly reasonable) selection of shows on Freeview and Freesat. The BBC's recent multi-channel coverage of Glastonbury is a good example.
That said, it is a horrible distraction and I feel guilty about the power consumption of the big plasma...
I love movies but cable is overpriced and overrated. Until it's a la carte, I'll stick to IPTV or OTAHD.
I've never blogged about this change in my TV owning situation, and never bored anyone with it. It occurred to me that I was probably not alone and having been hassled by the TV licensing people in the UK because they don't seem to believe me, I wondered how many other people don't have a working TV.
I'm not here to be holier-than-thou about it. But if you want an argument then, how about "what percentage of people who have a TV, get all defensive when they discover someone who doesn't have one?"
I'd be interested in TV owning situation for those with kids though. Not having a TV when you have kids is borderline abuse IMHO. Kids should have some exposure to popular culture, and be able to talk about the same stuff as their peers.
It's like some people who use adblock though. They just love to tell you at absolutely every single moment that they "see no ads!", I guess because it makes them feel clever.
That's me :-)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/01/iplayer_does_...
For me, having a TV at home when I was a kid was borderline abuse. I've considered it the idiot box for as long as I can remember myself, which would be since about three years old.
When I first moved away from my parents to live with my then-GF, she kinda wanted a TV but I firmly said no.
I've never had my own TV and never will.
I can't stand being in the same room with a running TV. I always ask to mute it at least; if that isn't possible, I leave the room or cover my ears. The issue isn't the noise; it's those horrible fake intonations that everyone uses on TV.
You could easily call the internet the 'idiot net'. People under the delusion that their opinion matters, mindlessly posting inane useless comments like this one.
Many of the biggest sites out there serve no real use other than to waste peoples time.
Would you exchange the Web for a TV with 1000 channels?
It would be a really hard decision between TV and the web, not sure which I'd choose TBH.
That doesn't mean that any given part of the internet will be better, but it does mean that the internet has the potential to be far better.
Except I grew up with the TV always on, even if no one was watching it, it was running, when I moved out, I avoided cable and TV for a while, too busy really. Now when I visit my parents or my brothers, it drives me up the wall that the TV has to constantly be running.
Then I say, "why would anyone want to force TV on their children", then you say, "I don't want to force it, you're misunderstanding". I feel like we've had this discussion before, you're trolling [1].
Borderline abuse is a serious accusation, but then I'd argue providing a child frequent and regular unrestricted access to TV (or internet) is borderline abuse, so maybe we're even. I don't think you're arguing that, though, I'm just strawmanning. My kids are as involved with pop-culture as any four and three year old should be, TV will never be necessary for that. As they grow TV is going to be less and less relevant (IMHO), so the point will be moot.
Side note, just had a funny conversation with son last night trying to explain what a television station is (he watched "the spongebob movie" on Nick Jr. at the doctor's office), "it's like a website that shows movies all the time, but you can't choose them" was the best I could do.
([1]: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=503251)
Apparently soon after he left home at 18, my Grandad then went out and bought a telly, and soon after got the biggest satellite package he could.
Anyway, I don't watch TV - where would I find the time for reddit and StumbleUpon if I did?
The results so far are almost 60/40, which I find intriguing from a personal point of view because I've never known a single person in real life who didn't own a TV - geeks and otherwise.. correlating somewhat with the "official" figures of 98-99% penetration.
Were it not for cable, I would probably have no TV here except, perhaps, one to plug the computer in to watch a movie.
E.g.,
Well... at least in my experience.And if it isn't Lost, it is West Wing or (yikes) Nip and Tuck.
What percentage of firefox users like to tell you at every single opportunity they don't use IE?
Probably not that high of a percentage. However, one is more likely to notice the people who don't own a TV and are vocal about it.
"Avoid the tube".
And it works.
However, the technology-loving part of me recently bought a decent Sony Bravia 1080p set for the purposes of watching tv series and films with housemates, as well as the news in the evening.
Definitely nice to have for the social element, as I'd much rather not be in my room staring at a PC screen outside of work. Streaming DivX over the wireless and having the housemate's PS3 plugged into it isn't much of an inconvenience either ;).
Deleted all news channels.
- There's a lot of smalltalk I can't engage in, you might not notice but there's a lot of references to TV personalities in daily interaction with people.
- Sometimes I miss big stories that are only communicated through television. Typically some documentary about online predators, horrible conditions at old people's home or such. Everyone but me seems to know.
- I'm terrible at movie trivia and references since I don't really watch any.
- I'm forced to do something when I'm bored. I can't just turn on the telly and chill out, I have to do something active like reading a book, fixing my boat or commenting on Hacker news.
- When I watch television somewhere I instantly think how much facade and how little information the medium contains. This has gotten worse over the years.
- I have a lot of freetime to do stuff.
thanks for the disclaimer!
Heh, I know exactly how you feel. Normally I'm fine with being left out of those conversations though.
"- When I watch television somewhere I instantly think how much facade and how little information the medium contains. This has gotten worse over the years."
This is also spot on, besides it feeling like a facade, it also is very very boring.
There are a lot of good books out there that deserve to be read and not a lot of TV deserving to be watched.
I "watch" this crap mainly because I don't grok Aussie entertainment yet. Footie shows; three varieties of Rugby, all day long. And a politics scene that's even more petty than Omaha's provencial manicupal government. I still haven't gotten over the fact that Aussies are only 20M people; it just puts everything in a very tiny prespective. You would think the people who brew Toohey's Extra Dry would have enough beer goggles around to breed like bunnies. Harden the fuckup, Australia! :-P
I find even if most TV programming is pretty average and dumbed down it's still good to sit down and chill out to when you can't be bothered with anything else. Its also necessary if your a sports fan.
When the kids are allowed to use their parents' desktop machine, they sometimes go to the Cartoon Network's site and watch Clone Wars reruns on it.
It's like having amazon automatically sending you the (currently) most modern books, without having any real choice.
Why on earth should I do so? If I really like a movie, I'll simply buy a DVD, because I want to see it more than once.
Now that it's back, I find myself watching ~1.5 hours a night again. I should just throw the thing out the window.