"The term 'software engineer' conjures images of pasty-faced young men with poor posture and limited social skills."
...
"We have this idea of people in technology being and looking a certain way," she said. "That stereotype is destructive, and I think that's part of the reason why female and minority programmers are so few."
...
Her personal opinions and prejudices aside, the article is a tad hypocritical. It's hard to tell to whom the stereotype is most destructive. The media has created and maintains the "nerd stereotype", which I would argue is more destructive to those who are classified as such: since they have to overcome a far more general prejudice than lack of visibility in a particular field.
CNN has a lot of nerve to use a racial slur such as 'pasty-faced'. I believe the correct term is Caucasian.
I am all for dropping the obviously false stereotype about nerds. But let's not paint this particular oppressed group as villains.
Do you see what I am doing here? Look for the truth my friends, and come to your own conclusions. Do not be complacent with their lies.
If you think about it, the way nerds took over the world was really pure evil genius. They suppressed the non-nerds with their body odor! By not showering, they managed to create an inaccessible elite.
> CNN has a lot of nerve to use a racial slur such as 'pasty-faced'. I believe the correct term is Caucasian.
I really hope this is sarcasm - pasty-faced quite obviously implies Caucasian, but specifically those with a lack of exposure to natural light i.e. being cooped up inside all day long with a computer prevents one from developing a tan.
A racial slur is typically thought of as a slur that is about race. Pasty-faced is not about race. It's about not getting enough sunlight. Race is implied because darker colored people do not look anything like paste when they don't get enough sun. But that race is implied does not mean pasty-faced is any more a racial slur than the negative use of "pale."
Funny how I am modded down yet the vulgar posts about boobs remain unscathed. Let me add that I do not wish to take anything away from this particular girl's achievements (let them stand on their own): but there is nothing wrong with neutralizing the antagonistic angle imposed upon the story.
1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6885123 - Homeless coder starts app
2. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6365495 - Africans genetically more corrupt?
3. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6448409 - Rick Ross's history
4. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6857739 - Nelson Mandela dies
5. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6035263 - (Most obvious)Resume with black vs white name
6. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6902563 - Cover up racist+sexist mindset in Harvard
7. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6907915 - Homeless coder finishes app
8. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6975732 - BlackGirlsCode event
9. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7040437 - BlackGirlsCode event mentioned in list of female-focused events in tech.
I'm going to just keep on collecting these links and post the list on every instance I see.
This will be added as the 10th. (Though I will make special note that this instance is probably made worse by the recent spotlight the tech-scene is under in regards to gender inequality).
You claim that what is happening is that every time a story than happens to involve a Black person or a woman is posted, people post comments about race/gender to derail the discussion.
What is actually happening is that every time a story promoting progressive views on race/gender (this story explicitly mentions gender), people post to disagree with the message of the story.
No. A positive story about a black person or a girl (which is good) does not require a negative slant against white men (hypocritical and bad). It is the unnecessary focus on race/gender and the negative angle that many of us are opposed to.
For your information I am the proud father of a mixed race baby girl. She will have every opportunity a loving father can provide for her. However I see no reason why she should adopt a victim mentality (which could only limit her potential).
I am only making you guys play by your own rules. If you really cared about black/white/insert-race (or male/female) relations then you would not feel the need to create opposite sides and then play one side against the other. The media, it would seem, has a completely different agenda than what they claim to offer. These behind the scenes lurkers and puppet-masters are the real villains to watch out for.
Yeah, it's hard to see how being looked down on as ugly people with bad social skills is a mark of privilege. I apologize for being such a loser, since its clearly oppressing normal attractive people who want to enter the field.
Perhaps their thinking is that if people who are born with the privilege of being White and male end up as losers, then those people must be objectively inferior and so there is nothing wrong with making fun of them. I have trouble following progressive thinking sometimes.
You almost had me with the "lot of never to use a racial slur..." part. Also, pasty-faced is the equivalent of ashy-faced (for black people) which is also not a racial slur.
I'd like to see more of coders from different interesting backgrounds having their 5 minutes in the spotlight reaffirmed as coders.
I'd like to see dancers who code, news anchormen, judges, soccer players and boxers who code (although last two might be harder with all the micro concussions).
Yay I have more points than her. Although my other career besides coding is commenting on HN. Probably significantly less demanding than being supermodel. Wait? She got them in just 9 months? Nevermind.
>The term 'software engineer' conjures images of pasty-faced young men with poor posture and limited social skills.
I'm really confused. Are we onto third or fourth wave feminism yet? I thought body shaming was bad and the modelling industry was evil.
Aren't we always being appealed to, as nerds, to empathize with groups that are underrepresented in tech, because we too, didn't fit in in high school?
I hope I'm not the only one that feels this way, but seriously, who gives a shit?
Look, I'm a 30-something overweight white male programmer. I probably spend equal time, if not more, communicating with people around the world based on their ideas and what they write rather than their physical person. What this means is that I don't care if you're a gay paraplegic cross dressing dolphin, a woman that can't leave her house in the deepest parts of Saudi Arabia, a 12 year old in Australia, or another guy just like me. It. Doesn't. Matter.
I'm sure if you're reading this, you know the old joke that no one knows you're a dog behind a keyboard. If you have good ideas and are willing to talk about them, what your background is just doesn't really matter.
I've been around long enough that I've talked to everyone, from billionaire kids to poor grandparents. People's ideas and thoughts are more important than anything else to me.
I'm glad that this person has had success in multiple areas. Is it remarkable as a news-worthy event? Maybe for CNN, but they aren't exactly a reputable news source these days. For me, and hopefully others, she's just a good programmer.
In the end, all that matters is someone's ability to think. Whether they're a supermodel or a dog doesn't fucking matter.
Yes for us, stuff like this doesn't matter since it's all about ability.
So why does she matter? Because regardless of the reality, programming is still seen by the masses as a well paid janitorial function that only uncool, socially inept, nerdy males should do. (Notice that I didn't say could but should.) This is why a lot of people have a "I'm too good to stoop down and do this" attitude, when it comes to things like programming. "That guy should do it instead of me." Programming or most technical occupations just don't command the same level of respect in the West like a finance, legal, or medical job does regardless of the pay.
People like Scott give programming a cool and acceptable image for non-techies and people still deciding what they want to be in the future. imo, the main reason females aren't into stuff like programming is because of its negative social perception. LAST EDIT: When I think about it, I'm surprised I haven't read anything addressing this problem when it comes to attracting more females to tech.
> So why does she matter? Because regardless of the reality, programming is still seen by the masses as a well paid janitorial function that only uncool, socially inept, nerdy males should do. (Notice that I didn't say could but should.) This is why a lot of people have a "I'm too good to stoop down and do this" attitude, when it comes to things like programming. "That guy should do it instead of me." Programming or most technical occupations just don't command the same level of respect in the West like a finance, legal, or medical job does regardless of the pay.
And the reality is that a lot of programming jobs are well paid janitorial functions. There is a lot of self delusion happening in the American programming industry that one needs to be a certain level of smartness (Observe posts on how all genius programmers have been programming since their youth). It really doesn't. There is nothing inherently complicated about most pieces of software related work. Note that this doesn't necessarily mean that there is not a lot of hard work in doing this efficiently. It is just that American programmers are loud and opinionated on how it takes years and years to become a good programmer. In India and China, people don't spend time thinking about the level of intellect required to write code, they just do it. In fact, dozens and dozens of them, of both genders. Now, there is a lot of that code that is bad. Yet, that is merely the normal distribution working at scale.
People need to think of programming as another job. Just because you were a snowflake and were oppressed in your high school doesn't mean that whatever you do in life is touched with some special magic that makes it inherently removed by people of other sub-cultures.
Going on a tangent, I disagree. While a lot of programmers in the West care about how smart someone is, we care more about how disciplined they are and whether or not they like what they're doing (more on this below).
> Now, there is a lot of that code that is bad. Yet, that is merely the normal distribution working at scale.
No. I feel that the majority of bad code that comes from those places is more due to culture than anything else. There's a mentality of "let's just get this done the fastest way possible without thinking about maintenance or the future." They don't really care about their work; they only care about the money it brings. There's no love for programming. It's just clock in and clock out. Regardless of how smart someone is, this type of thinking doesn't lead to quality code. (to be fair ppl like this exist here as well, just not as widespread or in the same proportion) Then there's the diploma mills that churn out graduates with no skills or preparation for a programming job... but that's another story. EDIT: It also doesn't help that the best and brightest in both places tend to leave for the West.
> People need to think of programming as another job.
This is the kind of thinking that leads to shitty work. It's hard for people to excel or churn out quality products when they're doing something for a paycheck that they don't really like doing.
1. On the idea that somehow technical debt is culturally ingrained in certain societies.
Silicon Valley is filled with countless programmers who continually drum the ship the shit out philosophy. If you haven't worked there, a rough sample of this forum's blog posts by clueless founders should indicate that.
I have worked in enough American run American programmer driven companies to know that technical debt is not an abstraction. It is a reality that is reflected by programmer pressures.
So it is not culture specific unless the culture you are talking about is programmer culture.
2. On the idea that western programmers care more about discipline rather than smarts.
Programming interviews as evidenced by personal experience and the realms of rants written online are a perfect reflector of the fallacy of that assertion. How the fuck is writing depth first search or some other bullshit graph search algorithm in 2 minutes any sign that you are a good programmer to design an iOS app?
> 1. On the idea that somehow technical debt is culturally ingrained in certain societies.
It is. I can speak confidently about it (at least for China) since my family is from there, I was born in the region, and I worked in East Asia for period of time. I know the culture(s). Whether or not they are right or wrong, my Indian friends and colleagues have confirmed the same problem in their country of origin.
Culture does matter in general and it affects things like technical debt. It's the reason why the US favors lawyers and bankers over engineers and programmers (and why Asia will most likely eclipse us in the long run), and the same reason that places like Japan have a dearth of entrepreneurs due to their fear of failure and aversion to risk.
On a whole, people in mainland China just don't give a shit about anyone outside of their family (and maybe maybe their friends and even this is a stretch since it's a low trust society). All they really care about is maximizing their economic gains and increasing their social status. The cost (i.e. who you screw over) doesn't matter as long as it doesn't directly hurt anyone in their extended blood related family. Quality and a lot of other things suffer from this pervasive way of thinking.
> 2. On the idea that western programmers care more about discipline rather than smarts.
Maybe hot startups focus solely on smarts, but larger, older, and less hip companies tend to care more about experience and just competence (i.e. can you understand the work and get things done that doesn't end up being spaghetti?) instead of how brilliant you are.
I agree with you. Although I guess there are arguments to be made about covering this to show potential role models from different backgrounds, it still isn't anything particularly noteworthy.
I also have very mixed feelings about the term "geek" being used. It seems to be thrown around for everything nowadays, from people who watch Doctor Who to people who are actually deeply invested in STEM. It's a good and admirable skill to have these days, being able to throw an iOS app, but the term has really lost its weight.
I think articles like this help to "normalize" programming as a career for people that aren't nerdy white dudes. The hypothesis goes, a lot of [women,minorities] don't go into [programming,finance,etc] because they don't see it as a career that people like themselves can or do choose. Puff pieces about "this person who is like you or who you aspire to be like is also into [programming,finance,etc]" help them visualize themselves choosing this career.
You may not agree, but I think having more women and minorities in programming would be a good thing. Because I think that articles like this are a way to help get young women and minorities interested in programming, I like that this article exists, even though it wasn't written for me.
While it might help "normalize" a programming career, it also reinforces the idea that no matter what a woman has accomplished (or is capable of) in her career, her physical appearance is at least as important when evaluating her accomplishments.
Full disclosure: I am a woman. I am also a student and CS major. I happen to be conventionally attractive, and rather than inspiring me, this kind of article contributes to certain fears I have, going into the industry. If we want to inspire young girls to be interested in programming, we should highlight the work of people like Marissa Meyer, who have worked really hard over many years...not give them the impression that being born tall and beautiful is as important as their resumes.
> If we want to inspire young girls to be interested in programming, we should highlight the work of people like Marissa Meyer, who have worked really hard over many years...not give them the impression that being born tall and beautiful is as important as their resumes.
It is funny you say that because guess what showed up on my Linkedin news feed the other day. [1]
I am aware that Marissa Meyer's looks are often spoken of. However, before she was a CEO, she earned degrees from some of the world's most highly ranked universities and did interesting work for another 13 years.
Regarding the article you posted - the advantage that attractive people have in the workplace is not limited to women; attractive men also earn this benefit. In fact, some studies show that if attractive women are applying for typically male-dominated fields, they are rated more negatively than their unattractive counterparts. Attractive males do not experience a noted disadvantage when applying for any job.
You may have same objections toward articles that would mention how much money a man makes, what an excelent breadwinner he is, how breave or strong he is. It would reinforce the idea that no matter how accomplished man is in his career what matters is how much money he makes or how manly he is.
I don't think that looks of Marrisa Mayer were not a factor in how much her story was covered.
When I think minorities, I think African American and Hispanic. I grew up in Nigeria and I'm lucky that my parents decided to move to America where I picked up on programming. If there were more notable blacks in SV, I would have decided on programming sooner.
Non white immigrants to me are not minorities but I could be and I probably am wrong.
> Non white immigrants to me are not minorities but I could be and I probably am wrong.
If you are going by the socio-cultural definition of a person who has not had the chances that the cultures in the U.S. have been given. There are enough minorities, American Indian, Hmong and so on to name a few.
If you are going by the definition of a person who ethnically belongs to a population who is not the majority, then there are Asians who have done well for themselves in the programming industry but still are minorities.
Oh also, sometimes there won't be people ahead to make the path for you. You have to get out there and make it yourself. I grew up in Ethiopia, touched a computer for the first time at the age of 16 (for thirty minutes because we paid by the minute). Not everyone has the magical opportunities that exist in America.
Your comment reeks of elitism (though much of the ones in this article do as well). I'm pretty sure that this article wasn't written with HN mind as the audience. Your reaction seemed a bit strong to me.
Can you tell me what you find to be a reputable news source? I'm not saying CNN is the best news source but they have to at least be in the top ten of news networks in the U.S. Maybe even in the top five?
And if you haven't noticed the general public does like "human interest" news. IMHO this is a step up from the local news in LA. It is at least positive rather than the overwhelmingly negative news that I seem to come across.
Anything that possibly encourages more young people (women) to get into programming should be encouraged (again IMHO).
On one hand you are kind of right that when you care about software or creations in general it does't matter if it was created by a supermodelor a dog. But the article is about real world. And in real world your creation has different value depending on whether you are Jackson Pollock or Johnny, age 5.
She as a black female supermodel can have much more impact on the world with her coding that overweight white guy that does exactly the same.
so mr. egalitarian, I'm so blind-I-only-see-ability.
You're telling me, with no question, if you were to see this woman in the middle of the street, you would think she could absolutely be a coder?
You're telling me if you saw her at a conference, you would think she was there as an expert, and not to find a husband, or was part of the booth babes or help staff?
You're telling me if you saw her on the roster to speak at a conference, you'd think she got it because of her prowess and intellect, and not because she dolled up?
I can't speak for "Mr Egalitarian", as you put it, but I can confidently say yes to all of those things (or more precisely, I wouldn't assume any of those things any less or more than if I saw an Asian man). Knowing the probability of a tech person being a certain race or gender doesn't mean one is forced to apply that knowledge, particularly when one is aware of the human cost of that kind of stereotyping/pidgeonholing. It sounds like you're just projecting a lot of racial and/or gender issues that you have onto the author of the parent comment.
Hooray for you, Mr. Colorblind, that you don't care about her looks, race, or gender. Unfortunately, women and black people (in the US at least) don't get to breezily dismiss it. The fact that you are apparently unaware of this leads me to think that you are exactly the kind of person who could do with a privilege audit.
You have funny definitions. As far as a hiring manager goes, sure, he should care about the persons ability. But this wasn't an interview -- he was commenting on an article about someone living in the real world.
In the US, there are still significant racial and gender issues. Ignoring them because you are "color blind" is not a commendable trait. It isn't racist; it is ignoring racism.
Brains aside, personally I don't think she's that beautiful.
I know at least 3 female programmers that I consider better looking (2 of them I have worked with).
negative stereotypes exist for both models (eg cocaine snorting anorexic bimbos) and computer nerds (antisocial smelly boring men who refuse to grow up while living in their mother's basement).
who cares? I get the points about the stereotypes in the article, which was pretty shallow. though there did exist the point that people don't always conform to stereotypes. models can be smart, nerds can be attractive.
By all means, lets ignore the countless incredible, perhaps in some cases average/normal looking women in tech and focus on one who happens to be also gifted in the looks department (as decided by whom? men? women?)
By emphasizing her uniqueness, they're perpetuating the stereotype they claim to abhor.
For me, this validates a lot of what I've often felt. I'm tired of being told, by feminists, that the reason I'm in computer science is because "white males are encouraged"; I want to tell them to get shoved in lockers, bullied, dumped in trash cans, harassed in the bathroom, and having the worst dating life in high school -- then tell me how "encouraging" is was. The reason I'm in computer science is because I enjoy it. I've often said to feminist friends that one does not go into computer science because they are encouraged - they often go into it because that's what they like, regardless of what anyone/society tells them. From what I can tell, this woman, the supermodel, felt social pains similar to mine and perused her interest nonetheless. I applaud her for that.
I've been noticing a general trend where news sites follow stories on Quora. Not sure if it's the demographic present on Quora or something else. Lyndsey Scott (model in the article) wrote an answer about her appearances in which she mentioned she's a developer as well on Quora back in December.
To all of you saying this doesn't matter and who gives a shit -- get real. There's this deep-seated elitism to programming that is really damaging to all types of backgrounds. The barrier for entry is high enough -- it's great there's a story about someone most wouldn't think of when thinking of a programmer. It benefits those interested in seeing computer science grow as a discipline to have more people in the fold.
81 comments
[ 0.28 ms ] story [ 141 ms ] thread...
"We have this idea of people in technology being and looking a certain way," she said. "That stereotype is destructive, and I think that's part of the reason why female and minority programmers are so few."
...
Her personal opinions and prejudices aside, the article is a tad hypocritical. It's hard to tell to whom the stereotype is most destructive. The media has created and maintains the "nerd stereotype", which I would argue is more destructive to those who are classified as such: since they have to overcome a far more general prejudice than lack of visibility in a particular field.
CNN has a lot of nerve to use a racial slur such as 'pasty-faced'. I believe the correct term is Caucasian.
I am all for dropping the obviously false stereotype about nerds. But let's not paint this particular oppressed group as villains.
Do you see what I am doing here? Look for the truth my friends, and come to your own conclusions. Do not be complacent with their lies.
I really hope this is sarcasm - pasty-faced quite obviously implies Caucasian, but specifically those with a lack of exposure to natural light i.e. being cooped up inside all day long with a computer prevents one from developing a tan.
Theory: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6441795
Potential examples:
I'm going to just keep on collecting these links and post the list on every instance I see. This will be added as the 10th. (Though I will make special note that this instance is probably made worse by the recent spotlight the tech-scene is under in regards to gender inequality).What is actually happening is that every time a story promoting progressive views on race/gender (this story explicitly mentions gender), people post to disagree with the message of the story.
I think you mean 'specious', though I guess 'spacious' also fits that description.
For your information I am the proud father of a mixed race baby girl. She will have every opportunity a loving father can provide for her. However I see no reason why she should adopt a victim mentality (which could only limit her potential).
I am only making you guys play by your own rules. If you really cared about black/white/insert-race (or male/female) relations then you would not feel the need to create opposite sides and then play one side against the other. The media, it would seem, has a completely different agenda than what they claim to offer. These behind the scenes lurkers and puppet-masters are the real villains to watch out for.
Perhaps their thinking is that if people who are born with the privilege of being White and male end up as losers, then those people must be objectively inferior and so there is nothing wrong with making fun of them. I have trouble following progressive thinking sometimes.
Please spare us your faux outrage. "Pasty faced" is not a racial slur by any reasonable definition of the term.
I'd like to see dancers who code, news anchormen, judges, soccer players and boxers who code (although last two might be harder with all the micro concussions).
[0]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/2274694/lyndsey-scott
I know the article was a bit fluffy- as human interest stuff often is - but I'm impressed. Anyone know her Github?
God you people are fucking creepy. Yes, it's a woman, who probably has breasts and a vagina, and she writes code. Why is this even a story?
I'm really confused. Are we onto third or fourth wave feminism yet? I thought body shaming was bad and the modelling industry was evil.
Aren't we always being appealed to, as nerds, to empathize with groups that are underrepresented in tech, because we too, didn't fit in in high school?
Edit: this isn't a joke, it's something I actually heard from a few sources.
Look, I'm a 30-something overweight white male programmer. I probably spend equal time, if not more, communicating with people around the world based on their ideas and what they write rather than their physical person. What this means is that I don't care if you're a gay paraplegic cross dressing dolphin, a woman that can't leave her house in the deepest parts of Saudi Arabia, a 12 year old in Australia, or another guy just like me. It. Doesn't. Matter.
I'm sure if you're reading this, you know the old joke that no one knows you're a dog behind a keyboard. If you have good ideas and are willing to talk about them, what your background is just doesn't really matter.
I've been around long enough that I've talked to everyone, from billionaire kids to poor grandparents. People's ideas and thoughts are more important than anything else to me.
I'm glad that this person has had success in multiple areas. Is it remarkable as a news-worthy event? Maybe for CNN, but they aren't exactly a reputable news source these days. For me, and hopefully others, she's just a good programmer.
In the end, all that matters is someone's ability to think. Whether they're a supermodel or a dog doesn't fucking matter.
So why does she matter? Because regardless of the reality, programming is still seen by the masses as a well paid janitorial function that only uncool, socially inept, nerdy males should do. (Notice that I didn't say could but should.) This is why a lot of people have a "I'm too good to stoop down and do this" attitude, when it comes to things like programming. "That guy should do it instead of me." Programming or most technical occupations just don't command the same level of respect in the West like a finance, legal, or medical job does regardless of the pay.
People like Scott give programming a cool and acceptable image for non-techies and people still deciding what they want to be in the future. imo, the main reason females aren't into stuff like programming is because of its negative social perception. LAST EDIT: When I think about it, I'm surprised I haven't read anything addressing this problem when it comes to attracting more females to tech.
And the reality is that a lot of programming jobs are well paid janitorial functions. There is a lot of self delusion happening in the American programming industry that one needs to be a certain level of smartness (Observe posts on how all genius programmers have been programming since their youth). It really doesn't. There is nothing inherently complicated about most pieces of software related work. Note that this doesn't necessarily mean that there is not a lot of hard work in doing this efficiently. It is just that American programmers are loud and opinionated on how it takes years and years to become a good programmer. In India and China, people don't spend time thinking about the level of intellect required to write code, they just do it. In fact, dozens and dozens of them, of both genders. Now, there is a lot of that code that is bad. Yet, that is merely the normal distribution working at scale.
People need to think of programming as another job. Just because you were a snowflake and were oppressed in your high school doesn't mean that whatever you do in life is touched with some special magic that makes it inherently removed by people of other sub-cultures.
> Now, there is a lot of that code that is bad. Yet, that is merely the normal distribution working at scale.
No. I feel that the majority of bad code that comes from those places is more due to culture than anything else. There's a mentality of "let's just get this done the fastest way possible without thinking about maintenance or the future." They don't really care about their work; they only care about the money it brings. There's no love for programming. It's just clock in and clock out. Regardless of how smart someone is, this type of thinking doesn't lead to quality code. (to be fair ppl like this exist here as well, just not as widespread or in the same proportion) Then there's the diploma mills that churn out graduates with no skills or preparation for a programming job... but that's another story. EDIT: It also doesn't help that the best and brightest in both places tend to leave for the West.
> People need to think of programming as another job.
This is the kind of thinking that leads to shitty work. It's hard for people to excel or churn out quality products when they're doing something for a paycheck that they don't really like doing.
1. On the idea that somehow technical debt is culturally ingrained in certain societies.
Silicon Valley is filled with countless programmers who continually drum the ship the shit out philosophy. If you haven't worked there, a rough sample of this forum's blog posts by clueless founders should indicate that.
I have worked in enough American run American programmer driven companies to know that technical debt is not an abstraction. It is a reality that is reflected by programmer pressures.
So it is not culture specific unless the culture you are talking about is programmer culture.
2. On the idea that western programmers care more about discipline rather than smarts.
Programming interviews as evidenced by personal experience and the realms of rants written online are a perfect reflector of the fallacy of that assertion. How the fuck is writing depth first search or some other bullshit graph search algorithm in 2 minutes any sign that you are a good programmer to design an iOS app?
It is. I can speak confidently about it (at least for China) since my family is from there, I was born in the region, and I worked in East Asia for period of time. I know the culture(s). Whether or not they are right or wrong, my Indian friends and colleagues have confirmed the same problem in their country of origin.
Culture does matter in general and it affects things like technical debt. It's the reason why the US favors lawyers and bankers over engineers and programmers (and why Asia will most likely eclipse us in the long run), and the same reason that places like Japan have a dearth of entrepreneurs due to their fear of failure and aversion to risk.
On a whole, people in mainland China just don't give a shit about anyone outside of their family (and maybe maybe their friends and even this is a stretch since it's a low trust society). All they really care about is maximizing their economic gains and increasing their social status. The cost (i.e. who you screw over) doesn't matter as long as it doesn't directly hurt anyone in their extended blood related family. Quality and a lot of other things suffer from this pervasive way of thinking.
> 2. On the idea that western programmers care more about discipline rather than smarts.
Maybe hot startups focus solely on smarts, but larger, older, and less hip companies tend to care more about experience and just competence (i.e. can you understand the work and get things done that doesn't end up being spaghetti?) instead of how brilliant you are.
I also have very mixed feelings about the term "geek" being used. It seems to be thrown around for everything nowadays, from people who watch Doctor Who to people who are actually deeply invested in STEM. It's a good and admirable skill to have these days, being able to throw an iOS app, but the term has really lost its weight.
So far she is a supermodel who codes, not a ninja coder that models.
You may not agree, but I think having more women and minorities in programming would be a good thing. Because I think that articles like this are a way to help get young women and minorities interested in programming, I like that this article exists, even though it wasn't written for me.
Full disclosure: I am a woman. I am also a student and CS major. I happen to be conventionally attractive, and rather than inspiring me, this kind of article contributes to certain fears I have, going into the industry. If we want to inspire young girls to be interested in programming, we should highlight the work of people like Marissa Meyer, who have worked really hard over many years...not give them the impression that being born tall and beautiful is as important as their resumes.
It is funny you say that because guess what showed up on my Linkedin news feed the other day. [1]
[1] http://qz.com/166317/why-it-makes-sense-to-pay-beautiful-ceo...
Regarding the article you posted - the advantage that attractive people have in the workplace is not limited to women; attractive men also earn this benefit. In fact, some studies show that if attractive women are applying for typically male-dominated fields, they are rated more negatively than their unattractive counterparts. Attractive males do not experience a noted disadvantage when applying for any job.
Further info on this phenomenon: http://www.hofstra.edu/pdf/orsp_shahani-denning_spring03.pdf
I don't think that looks of Marrisa Mayer were not a factor in how much her story was covered.
When you say minorities, who exactly do you mean? Silicon Valley has more non white immigrants writing code than 'young white dudes'.
Non white immigrants to me are not minorities but I could be and I probably am wrong.
If you are going by the socio-cultural definition of a person who has not had the chances that the cultures in the U.S. have been given. There are enough minorities, American Indian, Hmong and so on to name a few.
If you are going by the definition of a person who ethnically belongs to a population who is not the majority, then there are Asians who have done well for themselves in the programming industry but still are minorities.
Oh also, sometimes there won't be people ahead to make the path for you. You have to get out there and make it yourself. I grew up in Ethiopia, touched a computer for the first time at the age of 16 (for thirty minutes because we paid by the minute). Not everyone has the magical opportunities that exist in America.
But yes, the article wasn't great, CNN as you say.
Can you tell me what you find to be a reputable news source? I'm not saying CNN is the best news source but they have to at least be in the top ten of news networks in the U.S. Maybe even in the top five?
And if you haven't noticed the general public does like "human interest" news. IMHO this is a step up from the local news in LA. It is at least positive rather than the overwhelmingly negative news that I seem to come across.
Anything that possibly encourages more young people (women) to get into programming should be encouraged (again IMHO).
TLDR...don't hate.
She as a black female supermodel can have much more impact on the world with her coding that overweight white guy that does exactly the same.
You're telling me, with no question, if you were to see this woman in the middle of the street, you would think she could absolutely be a coder?
You're telling me if you saw her at a conference, you would think she was there as an expert, and not to find a husband, or was part of the booth babes or help staff?
You're telling me if you saw her on the roster to speak at a conference, you'd think she got it because of her prowess and intellect, and not because she dolled up?
Not caring about people's racial characteristics is "colorblindness" and also racist.
That really is a catch-22 scenario.
In the US, there are still significant racial and gender issues. Ignoring them because you are "color blind" is not a commendable trait. It isn't racist; it is ignoring racism.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/comic-riffs/post/nobody-...
who cares? I get the points about the stereotypes in the article, which was pretty shallow. though there did exist the point that people don't always conform to stereotypes. models can be smart, nerds can be attractive.
By emphasizing her uniqueness, they're perpetuating the stereotype they claim to abhor.