[–] akbar501 12y ago ↗ What was the performance difference (in ms)?I double-checked the article and did not see the actual performance numbers. [–] jaysoo 12y ago ↗ Updated the post with timing numbers.I want to note that the numbers can be deceiving though because they use different mechanisms to record elapsed time.When I ran the same task though Unix `time` I got numbers that were much closer, although still in Gulp's favour.
[–] jaysoo 12y ago ↗ Updated the post with timing numbers.I want to note that the numbers can be deceiving though because they use different mechanisms to record elapsed time.When I ran the same task though Unix `time` I got numbers that were much closer, although still in Gulp's favour.
2 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 15.8 ms ] threadI double-checked the article and did not see the actual performance numbers.
I want to note that the numbers can be deceiving though because they use different mechanisms to record elapsed time.
When I ran the same task though Unix `time` I got numbers that were much closer, although still in Gulp's favour.