Promotion of unimpressive new Facebook features hardly qualifies as something which "gratifies one's intellectual curiosity", which is, roughly, the most important measurement of weather something should be posted here.
Poster here. This "unimpressive feature" is at the heart of YC backed Posterous. Thought it would be interesting to see the comparison.
And if you want to talk about site guidelines, your comment is against them:
"Please don't submit comments complaining that a submission is inappropriate for the site. If you think something is spam or offtopic, flag it by going to its page and clicking on the "flag" link. (Not all users will see this; there is a karma threshold.) If you flag something, please don't also comment that you did."
I will use this, because the last time I wanted to upload a picture to facebook, I had to use some awful Java applet that crashed my browser (Note: this is not so much anti-Java as anti-today's-implementations-of-things-surrounding Java).
15 comments
[ 91.7 ms ] story [ 649 ms ] threadBegone!
And if you want to talk about site guidelines, your comment is against them:
"Please don't submit comments complaining that a submission is inappropriate for the site. If you think something is spam or offtopic, flag it by going to its page and clicking on the "flag" link. (Not all users will see this; there is a karma threshold.) If you flag something, please don't also comment that you did."
But our vision is quite a bit more than just that feature.
So is Facebook's. ;-)
The reality is that model is a massive oversimplification, and thinking that way is value destructive.
How is that not anti-Java? Today's implementations (there's more than one?) of things surrounding Java are all we have.
Go in through some U.S.-based proxy and it ought to work.