HN Explorer

The Co-Founder Dilemma – Rebekah Campbell (boss.blogs.nytimes.com)

3 points by cgl009 ↗ HN
At the start, no one wants to haggle over shares because, at this stage, the company isn’t worth anything. Right?

Wrong. The company does have a value at the start. It’s worth the energy and intellect the founding team is prepared to invest. When I started Posse, I felt this nascent idea had no inherent value, but when I look back on the level of work and perseverance I’ve applied over three years, that commitment was an important asset at the beginning.

1 comment

[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 14.8 ms ] thread
[dead] joyce
I would recommend a standard Silicon Valley 4-year vesting schedule, not a 3 year. It is amazing how many companies get into trouble because they overlook this little point. When I was a corporate attorney, I would counsel my clients to think about how they would feel if one cofounder had to leave the company to tend to a sick family member - what would be fair then? (It is easier for them to discuss that scenario than to think of one person just flaking).

Taking the vanilla approach of 4 year vesting allows everyone to be safe without having to have the pre-nup discussion on the wedding night.