The article is interesting, but can we change the title please?!?!
The current title in HN is "Yellowstone Supervolcanoe begins de-gassing rare Helium 4 isotope". Helium 4 is the most comon Helium isotope, the article says that the degasing started 2 millon years ago ("recentlty" in geological time). The URL is ...\la-sci-sn-yellowstone-helium-degassing-... , so this was probably the original title.
The current title of the article is "It's up, up and away for ancient trapped helium at Yellowstone". It's a little confusing and a little uninformative, but at least it's not wrong.
The title is quite accurate, as helium achieves escape velocity and escapes the Earth's gravity when it is released in the atmosphere, making it one of the rarest elements, in the long-term.
Of course, but Helium - any isotope - is quite rare and our supply strictly[1] decreases with time.
In fact, both (very useful) isotopes are rare for different reasons. He3 got expensive - enough to seriously impact medical and scientific uses - when we decided a beta-detector was needed across in port. (He4 we just waste in party balloons sigh)
[1] well, almost. Capturing alpha particles works, but good luck filling the LHC or your local MRI scanner from a source that expensive.
I thought the title was misleading enough to warrant a comment. It makes it seem like the Helium-4 isotope is exotic. Losing Helium-4 to the atmosphere is an acceptable research cost. Losing Helium-3 is not.
5 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 19.9 ms ] threadThe current title in HN is "Yellowstone Supervolcanoe begins de-gassing rare Helium 4 isotope". Helium 4 is the most comon Helium isotope, the article says that the degasing started 2 millon years ago ("recentlty" in geological time). The URL is ...\la-sci-sn-yellowstone-helium-degassing-... , so this was probably the original title.
The current title of the article is "It's up, up and away for ancient trapped helium at Yellowstone". It's a little confusing and a little uninformative, but at least it's not wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZkMQkHGj1s https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/6757fcdaa283
> He^3 : 0.000137% *
> He^4 : 99.999863% *
> * Atmospheric value, abundance may differ elsewhere
In fact, both (very useful) isotopes are rare for different reasons. He3 got expensive - enough to seriously impact medical and scientific uses - when we decided a beta-detector was needed across in port. (He4 we just waste in party balloons sigh)
[1] well, almost. Capturing alpha particles works, but good luck filling the LHC or your local MRI scanner from a source that expensive.