Results of: 7 developers, working 24/7 for 90 days, 1 house (in Colombia) (alexander.letmego.com)
Colombian entrepreneur Alex Torrenegra hired a small team of developers and for 90 days, they worked every waking moment, and except for one family weekend break, they did not leave the house. Food and other logistics was taken care of by another company. Here he tells how productive the experience was.
46 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 62.9 ms ] threadGood thing you used a framework. Who knows what would have happened if you didn't.
Also, I wonder how this would stack up against the same thing done on a 'regular' schedule. Of course nobody in their right mind is going to do an 'a/b' test on something like that but it would be interesting to see if this kind of all-out effort really pays off or if there are hidden costs which make it less than what it seems.
* 7 steps? Why would I want to be involved in something that complex? 3-4 steps max.
* 11 benefits? I'm not going to read or be able to process all that. 3 max, give me something I can quickly understand and tell friends about.
* That screenshot has got to go. Looks amateur at best.
Did my friend recommend this? Does the site save me money? Great, I don't care that there are 7 steps instead of 4.
I'd market it as a place for get-stuff-done-retreats for entire teams (I thought of the name "CramCamp") rather than the semi-luxury-relaxed setting of traditional conference resorts.
You're in the middle of nowhere, so physical distractions are few, but in nature, so clear-your-mind/10-mins-of-privacy walks are right out the door.
I'm a nerd, I've had my share of overnight music blasting pausing for the occasional ping-pong game pizza eating soda pounding programming sessions. I've even gone several months working > 60 hours a week, but still thats not near the intensity of this. My point is, it sounds like they have all their needs met except for one... for me I have a girl friend to take care of it, what do these guys do?
I would totally work in your office!
http://www.cocovivo.com/index.html
We didn’t reach the beta milestone completely, but we were able to release a limited beta version of the site. We are still developing some of LetMeGo’s traveler-focused features.
We found that the productivity of the team was also three times higher than usual. For those of you familiar with RescueTime, the tool we used, we measure productivity by multiplying average efficiency per week times the tracked time worked per week.
Productivity = Average Efficiency * Work Time
Productivity Working as Usual = 1.22 x 30.9h/week = 37.7/week
Productivity at the LetMeGo Immersion = 1.53 x 73.8h/week = 112.91/week
Ratio: 1:2.99
Given that the productivity and the cost increased side by side, we can then conclude that the biggest benefits is that we saved seven months of development. If it wasn’t for the Immersion, a limited beta of LetMeGo would have not been released yet and the full site would have not been launched until the second quarter of 2010."
Just curious since this is the first time I've heard of a "Colombian startup".
I promise this will not be the last time you hear about a Colombian startup. (Disclosure: I am Colombian too)
Seems to be another attempt to justify start-up whipping tactics to cash in quick rather than build a well-backed product with staff who won't hate you.
I can't see http://about.letmego.com/letmego/content/career_opportunitie... getting many visits.
Just my opinion of course. What would the inverse of this scenario be? A start-up that has remote workers and saves 3x the amount of money of keeping everyone in one spot, has flex hours, and hits the targets.
That would be something worth blogging about.
Imho the CTO/CEO of this start-up should have figured out a way to get something out there and test the concept for at most 1/10th of that cost. Much smarter, and cheaper, than trying to cram developers like chickens in a coop.
Swombat: You seemed to assumed that LetMeGo is my 1st startup. Actually, LetMeGo is my 4th startup. Not all of them have been successful, though.
27,000 hours may sound like a lot, but that is just a fraction of the time our competitors have invested in their software. Although you can be successful in other industries with very simple software, that is not usually the case in the lodging industry. I may be wrong, of course :S
Which is pretty damn cheap for a 40/hr week developer, nevermind 80.
So it's even smarter than at first appears.
edit: Colombia.
(sorry, just nitpicking a little ... :)
God, Channel 4'd be all over this. I'd best pitch the idea to them quick!
1. I'm not sure about Americans, but "lodging" translates very poorly for this Canadian. It's not that I don't understand it, it's just that people don't really use the word here. "Rooms" or "Beds" would be a better bet.
2. I'm questioning why I as a traveller would bother to "bid" on a room that I may know nothing about. Seems like a win for the hotelier, but a lose for me. I can stay at a hostel or hotel chain and have a reasonable expectation of what to expect. I can't do that at a B&B, but I can compare prices to get an idea of what would be up scale and what would be bargain basement. This site disables that, and brags about it. I really don't need to save $5 that badly.
About the process:
I think - humbly - that sometimes us geeks can get so caught up in the process of how we're building something that we lose sight of what it is we're actually building. This doesn't matter when you're making lego structures as a hobby, but it's completely relevant when you're trying to design a business.
How you do it is - in the end - largely irrelevant. Yes you can argue about productivity or the best way to get the most hours out of a day, but extremes aside it is not going to be what matters to your customer. I don't care if you used agile and got your product up in 10 hours or if it was a disastrous waterfall plan that needed to be redrawn 6 times and took 6 years to complete. I care about the product, and what it can do for me.
In this case (and I mean this respectfully) I get the impression that the process was the focus and the product was the afterthought. There's nothing wrong with that specifically, but it certainly shows through.
Additionally, we, at LetMeGo, use the word "lodging" because we are not only limited to hotels, beds, or rooms. We also cover vacation rentals, tents, and pretty much any place where you can sleep. "Lodging", which is the abstraction of all these, is not a common word because most online services only offer one type of lodging: hotels, or rooms, or vacation rentals, etc. That, hopefully, will change, as more options equals more competition and lower prices.
Ah, I see. That wasn't evident to me. The way it was described seemed to be that travellers were bidding on open rooms and highest bid won.
Your way is interesting, but I'm not sure what benefit it offers me as a traveller. In order to drive the service you'd need to create a market of travellers eager to provide the products to bid on. I'm having a hard time understanding why I would do that on the surface.
Also, I understand why you use the word lodging, I just don't think it fits. I need to know as a consumer exactly how I can benefit from your product. If I'm confronted with a word that I need to define, it delays my understanding of the product and increases the chance that I not use it.
Regardless, good luck to you. I wish you the best of successes.
http://alexander.letmego.com/2009/01/29/very-special-90-day-...
I see no mention of exercise, and:
* Unlimited food and beverages, including of course Red Bull and coffee.
* If interested, we will offer you healthy and balanced food. (emphasis mine)
I have to wonder how productivity would be affected if they offered an environment just as immersive, but a bit more focused on health. Healthy mind in healthy body, right? I don't think I could last more than a couple of weeks.
UPDATE: I found a picture of their meals... http://letmego.com/to/141440/gallery#http://hal.bz/i//l14144...
I'm guessing that system is going to be very difficult to maintain. You need some downtime for designs to settle in your mind and to be sure that it's going to work.
If you're going 24/7 for 90 days, I expect the design to be poor, the code to be hacked/patched, the bug count per loc to be very high and the test coverage to be minimal.
Instead of taking personal responsibility for entrepreneurial, management, and financial shortcomings, you've degraded people's health and sanity.
Going so far as to mock these people who built your product by showing before and after pictures of them in a state of decline and then presenting that to us as "humor" is a bit much.
I'm insulted and ashamed at the way this operation was carried out. Hacker News is supposed to be a community of the forward thinking, not those who wish to revert to the abuses of the industrial era.
Wonder what the reason is to load the last payment and underpay on the first 2, more pressure to push to complete the project at the end?
I know that after some really long days, I look back at what I wrote and am like WTF did I do.