Why The 'Reasons to Ban Handheld Devices Article" is Wrong, Stupid (nostrikethat.com) 12 points by mfitten 12y ago ↗ HN
[–] ta223 12y ago ↗ This comment pretty much sums it up: I, too, have not read the original article and have no urge to. This article is brilliant and just my cup of smart- ass-take-that kind of writing. [–] tempodox 12y ago ↗ I concur. Besides, who believes what HuffPo says, anyway? [–] ta223 12y ago ↗ To clarify: The quality of the comment I quoted is indicative of the quality of TFA.
[–] tempodox 12y ago ↗ I concur. Besides, who believes what HuffPo says, anyway? [–] ta223 12y ago ↗ To clarify: The quality of the comment I quoted is indicative of the quality of TFA.
[–] ta223 12y ago ↗ To clarify: The quality of the comment I quoted is indicative of the quality of TFA.
[–] MartinCron 12y ago ↗ Can we change the title to match the page's title: "10 reasons why the '10 reasons to ban handheld devices' article is wrong, stupid" ?That way people can see that it's sloppy click-bait listicle + "funny" picture garbage and ignore it as I wish that I had?
6 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 25.9 ms ] threadWell there's your first problem.
That way people can see that it's sloppy click-bait listicle + "funny" picture garbage and ignore it as I wish that I had?