2 comments

[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 15.5 ms ] thread
I truly hate media that trivializes serious philosophical positions.

The boombox isn't just as intelligent as the dog, but it may be indistinguishable sound-wise from the dog. If you can make a computer perform an "intelligent" task, then I don't care what's going on underneath. I would still call it intelligent.

And if you can make a robot perform some of the tasks dogs can do (walking around without any foreknowledge of the environment, for one), I'd call it a significant advancement in AI. Those tasks just aren't related to making noises...