[–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ Plain prerendered html5 with no JS was not available? [–] JetSpiegel 12y ago ↗ Where's the framework for that? [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ the great text files framework. [–] JetSpiegel 12y ago ↗ And its IDE, vim. [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ I prefer nano, as it reminds me to keep the files short. [–] Daviey 12y ago ↗ fenchurch [–] FooBarWidget 12y ago ↗ What makes you think www.ubuntu.com is not prerendered html5? [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ The page: http://design.canonical.com/2014/03/making-ubuntu-com-respon... Shows as 112 KB by lori in FF. Really? 1/10 MB for a page of text? [–] tvxedoman 12y ago ↗ jQuery was probably already cached on your end, all 300kb of it [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ Yes, probably. but that means there is still 100+KB being sent over the wire each time... [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ And sincehttp://design.canonical.com/2014/03/making-ubuntu-com-respon...goes 404, I assume there's a handler that built the page on the fly.No? [–] tych0 12y ago ↗ No, e.g. I use this rule in my .htaccess on my blog: RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^.*\.html$ RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule ^(.*)$ %{REQUEST_FILENAME}.html Which means you can access:http://tycho.ws/music or http://tycho.ws/music.html [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ ok, so where's the .html file for that page? [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ I went to http://www.canonical.com/index.html and there was a 404.Surely there should be something there... [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ There's also no robots.txt... Odd for a static site don't you think? [–] tych0 12y ago ↗ I suppose it isn't obvious from the rule I gave, but it doesn't necessarily have to even be web accessible. Why does it matter so much anyway?
[–] JetSpiegel 12y ago ↗ Where's the framework for that? [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ the great text files framework. [–] JetSpiegel 12y ago ↗ And its IDE, vim. [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ I prefer nano, as it reminds me to keep the files short. [–] Daviey 12y ago ↗ fenchurch
[–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ the great text files framework. [–] JetSpiegel 12y ago ↗ And its IDE, vim. [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ I prefer nano, as it reminds me to keep the files short.
[–] JetSpiegel 12y ago ↗ And its IDE, vim. [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ I prefer nano, as it reminds me to keep the files short.
[–] FooBarWidget 12y ago ↗ What makes you think www.ubuntu.com is not prerendered html5? [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ The page: http://design.canonical.com/2014/03/making-ubuntu-com-respon... Shows as 112 KB by lori in FF. Really? 1/10 MB for a page of text? [–] tvxedoman 12y ago ↗ jQuery was probably already cached on your end, all 300kb of it [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ Yes, probably. but that means there is still 100+KB being sent over the wire each time... [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ And sincehttp://design.canonical.com/2014/03/making-ubuntu-com-respon...goes 404, I assume there's a handler that built the page on the fly.No? [–] tych0 12y ago ↗ No, e.g. I use this rule in my .htaccess on my blog: RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^.*\.html$ RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule ^(.*)$ %{REQUEST_FILENAME}.html Which means you can access:http://tycho.ws/music or http://tycho.ws/music.html [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ ok, so where's the .html file for that page? [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ I went to http://www.canonical.com/index.html and there was a 404.Surely there should be something there... [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ There's also no robots.txt... Odd for a static site don't you think? [–] tych0 12y ago ↗ I suppose it isn't obvious from the rule I gave, but it doesn't necessarily have to even be web accessible. Why does it matter so much anyway?
[–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ The page: http://design.canonical.com/2014/03/making-ubuntu-com-respon... Shows as 112 KB by lori in FF. Really? 1/10 MB for a page of text? [–] tvxedoman 12y ago ↗ jQuery was probably already cached on your end, all 300kb of it [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ Yes, probably. but that means there is still 100+KB being sent over the wire each time...
[–] tvxedoman 12y ago ↗ jQuery was probably already cached on your end, all 300kb of it [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ Yes, probably. but that means there is still 100+KB being sent over the wire each time...
[–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ Yes, probably. but that means there is still 100+KB being sent over the wire each time...
[–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ And sincehttp://design.canonical.com/2014/03/making-ubuntu-com-respon...goes 404, I assume there's a handler that built the page on the fly.No? [–] tych0 12y ago ↗ No, e.g. I use this rule in my .htaccess on my blog: RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^.*\.html$ RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule ^(.*)$ %{REQUEST_FILENAME}.html Which means you can access:http://tycho.ws/music or http://tycho.ws/music.html [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ ok, so where's the .html file for that page? [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ I went to http://www.canonical.com/index.html and there was a 404.Surely there should be something there... [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ There's also no robots.txt... Odd for a static site don't you think? [–] tych0 12y ago ↗ I suppose it isn't obvious from the rule I gave, but it doesn't necessarily have to even be web accessible. Why does it matter so much anyway?
[–] tych0 12y ago ↗ No, e.g. I use this rule in my .htaccess on my blog: RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^.*\.html$ RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule ^(.*)$ %{REQUEST_FILENAME}.html Which means you can access:http://tycho.ws/music or http://tycho.ws/music.html [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ ok, so where's the .html file for that page? [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ I went to http://www.canonical.com/index.html and there was a 404.Surely there should be something there... [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ There's also no robots.txt... Odd for a static site don't you think? [–] tych0 12y ago ↗ I suppose it isn't obvious from the rule I gave, but it doesn't necessarily have to even be web accessible. Why does it matter so much anyway?
[–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ ok, so where's the .html file for that page? [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ I went to http://www.canonical.com/index.html and there was a 404.Surely there should be something there... [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ There's also no robots.txt... Odd for a static site don't you think? [–] tych0 12y ago ↗ I suppose it isn't obvious from the rule I gave, but it doesn't necessarily have to even be web accessible. Why does it matter so much anyway?
[–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ I went to http://www.canonical.com/index.html and there was a 404.Surely there should be something there... [–] chris_mahan 12y ago ↗ There's also no robots.txt... Odd for a static site don't you think?
[–] tych0 12y ago ↗ I suppose it isn't obvious from the rule I gave, but it doesn't necessarily have to even be web accessible. Why does it matter so much anyway?
18 comments
[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 50.1 ms ] threadhttp://design.canonical.com/2014/03/making-ubuntu-com-respon...
goes 404, I assume there's a handler that built the page on the fly.
No?
http://tycho.ws/music or http://tycho.ws/music.html
Surely there should be something there...