12 comments

[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 40.7 ms ] thread
Free version is 7 minutes, but in-app purchase eliminates 3 of those minutes?
Seems like two separate apps.
They say it's scientifically proved, a lot. What are those journals / scientific studies, especially for the cardio part of the exercise? It seems too good to be true in a "this isn't actually good, but instead dangerous" sort of way, in my not-educated-in-fitness mind.
http://journals.lww.com/acsm-healthfitness/Fulltext/2013/050...

But honestly, if you think 20 seconds of pushups, lunges, and running place are "dangerous" I'm not sure what to say (seems like we all survived gym class just fine). Just go at a reasonable pace, and if you get exhausted, or if something hurts, take a break.

Sudden, intense motion at regular, yet infrequent intervals and without any preparation between them seems like a great way to tear a ligament or tendon to this uneducated person.

Of course, I'm always thinking about the wonderful injuries that I can get being a weekend warrior, and that's going at it super hard at infrequent (yet regular) intervals.

Sure, for weightlifting, maybe -- but bodyweight exercises like squats and pushups? About the same chance as tearing something when picking up a phone you dropped on the floor. Like anything, just go at a reasonable pace. (I'm not a fitness expert, but exercises like this were the warmup in whatever class I would be in, no "preparation" to do a pushup or squat.)
You're not weightlifting when you tear an ACL skiing or snowboarding. It just seems like a poor idea.
Isn't that 4-minutes workout available on the web? How am I supposed to workout without an iPhone/Android?
>Tabata workouts are 5 times more effective than traditional cardio workouts.

sigh

The Tabata protocol is nothing of the sort:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabata_protocol#Tabata_regimen

The Tabata group had a 40% larger increase in VO2 max -- not five times as much!

The now-famous 7-minute workout is based on the following article, which is a good article, from the American College of Sports Medicine:

http://journals.lww.com/acsm-healthfitness/fulltext/2013/050...

It should be noted that, for individuals who have already achieved some degree of athleticism, the authors state clearly -- and this is never reproduced in pop journalism:

> Total time for the entire circuit workout is approximately 7 minutes. The circuit can be repeated 2 to 3 times.

Now, let's crunch some easy numbers for a second: there are 12 30-second intervals with 11 10-seconds rests between them, this is 7:50 min:sec, and with a short (~30s) break in between it's at least a 16 minute workout. Not seven.

Though, personally, I've been doing it for a while, and the one circuit is still pretty tiring. I'm hoping to move up to two in a couple weeks or so, like, maybe. Ultimately, the time is the least of your concerns. High-intensity circuit training is hard: if you're motivated to do HICT, time will not bother you, believe me.

The 4-minute version does not seem to have any scientific literature behind it -- if I had to guess, it's just six of the exercises from the 7-minute workout. I would also strongly suggest warming up before any sort of HIIT, because rhabdo is real and it's not a risk worth taking -- if you get dizzy, stop.

Oh god... so much wrong with this.

Tabata workouts have always resonated with supplementary fat loss workouts - workouts you do in addition to a regular strength program. They're always recommended to be done with front squats because of the full body demand, as well as relatively light weight required. Doing a 4 minute push up tabata is not going to tax your entire body nearly as much as a front squat tabata.

I figured that in a place like HN that has the wherewithal to understand that things like fitness are not quick-and-easy fixes, that they take a lifetime of eating well and exercising, and yet we're still plagued with the "get rich quick" schemes. There's no shortcuts to a healthy body.