13 comments

[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 39.0 ms ] thread
Why would anyone invest in a web site launched by a man currently fighting extradition which operates in much the similar fashion to his previous web site that was seized by a massive international law enforcement operation? Granted, the FBI et al are in no mood to go forward with a similar operation any time soon given the mess that they are in with the first one but there are so many risks here - and so little prospect of decent money - that you'd need to consider your money expendable to put it into this company.

And TRS plan to buy the company by issuing shares in it - so they face no risk; they'll simply raise the money from share buyers.

You claim that the new website (mega.co.nz) operates in "much the similar fashion to his previous website," but I don't think that's true. The new website is nothing like megaupload / megavideo. The new website is much more comparable to websites like dropbox / box / onedrive. If you disagree, could you please explain what makes mega.co.nz so radically different from services like dropbox / box / onedrive / etc. ?
A founder and main public figure with a decade long criminal history, maybe.
I think Kim Dotcom is a hilarious character that reminds me of a fat Austrian Hank Scorpio, but I wouldn't invest more than a giggle of money in Mega with the way law enforcement has tripped over themselves trying to crush him.
The fact that he's still going despite their trying to crush him suggests that he may be a good bet.
This is what you get when following his investments:

In 2001, Schmitz bought €375,000 worth of shares of the nearly bankrupt company Letsbuyit.com (de) and subsequently announced his intention to invest €50 million in the company. The announcement caused the share value of Letsbuyit.com to jump and Schmitz cashed out, making a profit of €1.5 million. One commentator suggested that Schmitz may have been ignorant of the legal ramifications of what he had done, since insider trading was not made a crime in Germany until 1995, and until 2002 prosecutors also had to prove the accused had criminal intent.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Dotcom#Criminal_investigati...

I wouldn't say that an element of risk is an advantage.
The amazing thing is that Hollywood and the US government managed to make a colourful racing identity like Kim Dotcom look like the good guy.
We will see if investors are foolish enough to go along with that idea.
I bet Kim enjoys himself a lot these days. Now, this guy with a long history of shady businesses and convicted crimes is suddenly the good guy. He plays his part, but do me favor and don't invest any money into one of this guys endeavors or you will be thoroughly disappointed.
Exactly. My girlfriend worked for Megaupload for a few years and said the whole copyright infringement stuff is just the tip of the iceberg. His big business was laundering money for European organized crime. This man is no folk hero.
We should also never forget how he operated a BBS in the 90's and recorded user data. When he was eventually arrested for calling card fraud, he used that data to strike a deal and buy his freedom while completely selling out his users.