1 comment

[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 11.8 ms ] thread

    Delegation should be instant and dynamic. If I trust
    somebody to make a decision on my behalf, I should be
    able to delegate to them instantly. And if they lose 
    my trust, I should be able to take it away with the 
    same speed.
It sounds nice until one considers certain conditions where emotion takes dangerous bias in collective decision making. Think: after a tragedy or during a war.

"Delegating" is the the lazy form of democracy. At least on the ethical and moral responsibility level. Discussion and action are the least lazy. I agree with the OP that other discussion platforms show how that can be done better. Influence of such platforms may come naturally as the zombie generation (read: TV) dies off and the participatory generation (read: Internet) becomes more commonplace. But they should definitely be encouraged.

To me the keyword comes from opinion modelling rather that direct decision and low-latency delegation. As we gauge and model opinion better this will increase citizen influence. ... I'm still not sure however if this is a good thing. In any case the OP's project looks to be an interesting project to build a system to foster such communication of opinion:

    https://www.loomio.org/
    The world needs a better way to make decisions together.