10 comments

[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 24.8 ms ] thread
Isn't that the DailyKos logo? What is up with that?
So it is..maybe DK had licensed it from getty Images but didn't buy an exclusive, or maybe there's a copyright lawsuit in the offing. Anyway, delicious irony.
Isn't publishing in the WSJ just preaching to the choir?
http://m.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/national-affairs/th...

Can we please get back to discussing the stuff that really matters, like Lisp vs Erlang? (a: neither, I'm a pragmatist and work with Obj-C and Ruby)

In all seriousness, though, I used to enjoy reading HN because it was the one place where I could avoid this sort of stuff. (Article flagged.)

If you're just talking about generic Lisp then it doesn't really hold a candle to Erlang in terms of concurrency primitives. However Racket supports a lot of the same things Erlang does like asynchronous channels, mailboxes, lightweight threads, etc... I really encourage you to check it out :)
Yeah yeah, but I just want to build apps that people will use. I'm not particularly interested in getting bogged down in what I see as only being a pissing match between hardcore CS people :)
It's hard to take this seriously when the headline accuses everyone who disagrees with you as being a "collectivist"
It's disappointing when the rich complain about the poors. If you're rich stop complaining about ObamaCare and build a better a better product/service.

Billionaires, gather a few of your friends in a room & build a solution then: 1. One will build a hospital in your town, that accepts NO insurance, only cash. 2. One will build a bank that finances the patients of that hospital. 3. One will buy the loans from that bank and sell those loans to investors on Wall Street, so the bank can finance more patients at the hospital. 4. One will write a risk management API so loan interest rates can accurately be set for each patient. 5. One will use that API and start a crowd funding company, enabling "savers" to bipass the above bank and earn a return from loaning to "borrowers/patients" directly. That person will then put the bank(s) out of business. 6. ...

(comment deleted)