It has a cleaner interface, but I have to click a button every time I find a login that doesn't work to get a new suggestion. On bugmenot, I don't have to wait for code.
On the other hand, this might somehow protect the site from getting scraped by a domain that doesn't want logins showing up there... maybe?
It'll work until the sites that require logins go here and disable any user names they find.
I like this clause in the TOS, I'm sure it will make a huge difference:
# If you are an owner, employee, partner, affiliate or representative (legal or otherwise) of any site which enforces compulsory user registration then you are forbidden from accessing any resource of this site. Failure to comply constitutes unauthorized access
True, but one of the things that is different about their approach is that it doesn't show a list of all their logins making it a bit more difficult for sites that require logins to just disable the usernames.
Bugmenot presents a long list which makes them much easier to disable.
I think it's example harrisbank.com is sleazy. I clicked it and then it went on to say: "Sorry, no logins for: harrisbank.com Please, add your login and password".
I don't think you want to encourage anyone to ever give you their bank's login data...
14 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 42.0 ms ] threadOn the other hand, this might somehow protect the site from getting scraped by a domain that doesn't want logins showing up there... maybe?
I like this clause in the TOS, I'm sure it will make a huge difference:
# If you are an owner, employee, partner, affiliate or representative (legal or otherwise) of any site which enforces compulsory user registration then you are forbidden from accessing any resource of this site. Failure to comply constitutes unauthorized access
Bugmenot presents a long list which makes them much easier to disable.
I don't think you want to encourage anyone to ever give you their bank's login data...
"For example: gals.milfspregnant.com"
Seriously. I mean, I laughed. Others might not .,..