Reading that PR release and their landing page, there are so many unanswered questions.
How is this different from PubNub or Pusher, which also provide push as a service? What is the pricing for the service? Are there first-party libraries for popular languages?
Hey there. The main difference is that Fanout is invisible to clients. You explicitly choose the data transports and formats. This makes it well-suited for fronting public APIs, since you're in control of the interface. Our codebase is also open source.
11 comments
[ 4.7 ms ] story [ 43.1 ms ] threadWe're not sure! We're not working with OneBusAway, but I think the author of the article was trying to convey a sense of realtime with that image.
Sorry for the confusion!
We really want this to be the easiest and most cost effective way to scale realtime so if you have a specific use case in mind we'd love to hear more!
How is this different from PubNub or Pusher, which also provide push as a service? What is the pricing for the service? Are there first-party libraries for popular languages?
This article goes into good detail about the reference implementation for our HTTP transport: http://blog.fanout.io/2013/04/09/an-http-reverse-proxy-for-r...
Although it could be made more apparent, we have Python and Node libraries in our GitHub: https://github.com/fanout/
Also RealCrowd developed a .NET library: https://github.com/realcrowd/grip.net