HN Explorer

The future of crowd-sourced news?

2 points by dcy ↗ HN
Despite great strides in democratizing news through social applications like twitter , I still have a hard time getting real-time news that's relevant to me (I mostly find news that are relevant/amusing/interesting on a global scale). How can you envision consuming news say 5-10 years down the line ? P.S: Wild speculation is encouraged as long as it follows a clear train of thought and reasoning.

8 comments

[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 26.6 ms ] thread
gojomo
Do you need real-time news?

I enjoy Twitter (and other feed/social interfaces like HN) but many aspects of these designs are abusive/exploitative of attention, creating a false sense of novelty and urgency.

I expect as this becomes better understood, intelligent summaries and filters, at longer controlled intervals, will become more prevalent. The 'Nuzzel' service, which builds a TechMeme-like summary from your own network, is one step in that direction.

A feed service that's loyal to users/developer, rather than advertisers – like App.Net, even if not App.Net itself – could also be an important part of the future. Why? What's needed is client/UX innovation that actually calms the interactions, via reordering/rearrangement/aggressive-filtering leading to less (but higher-quality) engagement... and Twitter/Facebook have strong incentives in the other direction.

dcy
No I don't. At least not all the time.

I just started with the assumption that getting real-time quality news is the shining light at the end of the news tunnel.

Which seems like a reasonable assumption considering that every innovation/breakthrough in news/information industry has been heading in that general direction.

There are only 3 contexts by which news is relevant time(no one is interested in what happened years ago), location and category. Blogs have clearly favored category and applications like twitter have greatly reduced the time (although I believe twitter is not streamlined to get the most important news out quickest,different discussion). The only way to further reduce that time seems to be by truly democratizing news as in crowd-sourced news.

gojomo
What's an example of "important news"? Does it change what you do, and if so, has there been any in the last week, or month?

Who right now is paying for "real-time quality news"?

dcy
I'd say the Malaysian flight disappearing/crashing-into-the-ocean is 'important' news. Here it is of global relevance because of the catastrophic nature of the incident, but one could easily argue that a series of break-ins on your street is important as well ,albeit its relevance is local therefore its only important to the people of the locality.

I believe future news/social applications will have to harmoniously marry the global with the local. In all humble honesty I sorta envision these really cool applications that'll be aware of where we are and what we want and serve us relevant content.This idea is exciting to me because we don't have to wait for superior technology to build them.

gojomo
Have you changed anything about your life in reaction to the MH370 news? Did hearing about a new theory, or possible new piece of floating debris, ever improve your day?
dcy
Also crowd-sourced news seems to be the elusive puzzle that everyone seems to be trying to solve (what with facebook's new trending feature), but no one has quite figured out how . It's a unique problem in that it is just as hard technically as it is socially.
[deleted]
(comment deleted)
[deleted]
(comment deleted)