Ask HN: Why Will No One Hire Jr. Devs?
I'm graduating from a developer bootcamp in Portland, OR next month. I have extensive startup experience in non-developer roles. As I'm pounding the pavement looking for my first jr. developer gig, I'm finding many companies are turning their backs on jr. developer candidates without reviewing work / resumes / etc at all. It seems like a lot of people are excited about training jr. devs, but not excited about hiring them. Does anyone have any tips for a new jr. dev out in the wild? Why are companies reluctant to hire jrs?
29 comments
[ 4.3 ms ] story [ 70.2 ms ] threadIf you were hiring, you probably wouldn't choose someone who describes themselves as a novice. Don't focus on your lack of experience, but your other attributes.
The two bootcamp grads we hired had much stronger skills than most of their peers. I had conversations with their instructors and, indeed, they said that these guys were top of the class.
Also note that while senior devs are hard to find, competition is fierce at the junior level. We relocated one from Boston and the other had done his bootcamp in Chicago.
- Lack of confidence in his deliverables. The worst is being told its done because it works on local and for small data sets (he's in charge of internal analytics) and then when we try it on production with a months worth of data it crashes.
- Having to constantly remind him of the 80-20 rule. 80% of effects are due to 20% of the functionality and having to guide him to focus on that 20%. You want to be able to leave a dev working for two days, even a week, without worrying that he's accidentally inflating the scope of something. More experienced devs have a better sense of the importance and time-scale of the things they're working on.
- He's often so overwhelmed with having to learn things he doesn't know, or debug things he doesn't fully understand, that he doesn't have time or energy to think about ways in which to improve the company or product outside of his job description.
- Junior devs often need constant check-ins because they're sometimes ashamed of having to ask. This happens no matter how many times you reinforce that asking questions is the only way to learn, its human nature to a certain extent.
My perspective, from a bootstrapped pre-seed post-launch startup, is that early on you want people that can drive forward with you, that can push you, not people you have to pull along with you. We've kept our junior dev because he's motivated, passionate, and has potential. But I'd be lying if I said he doesn't hinder our speed
In regards to the OP, he should target larger companies (>50 employees). These companies will have better systems in place to be able to take on junior devs in a way that won't be overwhelming.
You also don't specify where you are applying. Startups or corporates?
I've also never heard of any major tech companies in OR, so perhaps you may need to consider relocating.
If I was in your position, I would go for some company like Oracle/RackSpace/RedHat. Do the ugly grunt work for a year or so and gain a shit load of experience. Don't be afraid to do as many certifications as the company can afford as well.
You can then leave after that year or so. Go do some startup stuff, see if you like it. If you don't, you can always go back to the $90k job with your certs.
PS. Here are some keywords for a startup job (polite humour): "I know web-scale" ; "node.js and async rule the world" ; "non-relational DBs shard efficiently and beat relational DB asses" ; "rapid prototyper" ; "Rails gems" ; "convention over configuration" .
Good luck!
That said, if you get an interview I'm not saying to misrepresent yourself. But you're focusing on your inexperience right now. Your resume should focus on what you've accomplished, not on what you haven't.
The people I interviewed (admittedly only three, but the ones who I thought had the strongest resumes out of their cohorts), were unable to complete even basic real-world programming tasks during the interviews. I would literally sit them down, show them my code base, and ask them to make a minor improvement to a page (i.e something that would take me <10-20 minutes to do myself). None of them got close to finishing the task in a reasonable way.
I think the basic problem is that programming is hard and learning to do it at a professional level takes a lot longer than 8-12 weeks. Much like learning to be a lawyer takes more than 12 weeks -- you wouldn't hire a criminal defense lawyer who had graduated from a "lawyer bootcamp."
If you actually do have the skills to do the job, the best way to demonstrate it is to build a complete, functional, polished website and put your code on Github. Some candidates I looked at had "bootcamp demo projects" on Github but the quality of them was way, way below where it needed to be to prove they were adequately skilled.
As they say: "show, don't tell".
I'm all about hiring new devs and giving them a chance, but if I meet someone who strikes me as somewhat shy about speaking up its definitely a red flag.