As a general principle, this seems like bad policy.
1) It means that a building owner has an overwhelming incentive to never allow graffiti on their building.
2) It means that graffiti artists have the power to retard residential growth in a city, worsening NYC's problem with affordable housing.
But judges don't make policy, so we'll see how this plays out.
1 comment
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 10.4 ms ] thread1) It means that a building owner has an overwhelming incentive to never allow graffiti on their building. 2) It means that graffiti artists have the power to retard residential growth in a city, worsening NYC's problem with affordable housing.
But judges don't make policy, so we'll see how this plays out.