I'm interested in the reaction of the US public. Will they suddenly start to be concerned about total surveillance?
Reading German tech forums, I get the impression Germans are just as concerned about German surveillance as they are about US surveillance. It's very unpopular and seen as a waste of tax money. Biased sample, though.
Living in an underdeveloped country like mine is fiddled with inconveniences, but at least the intelligence agencies are off our backs. The authorities' cybercrime awareness is abysmally low, and I remember seeing Serbia colored the "not-monitored-at-all" color on that Snowden-related surveillance map.
It is a little concerning to see things like this happen near me, but for now I am grateful for the lack of pressure on me personally. I would love if the pressure ended everywhere, though, but it seems like it will only escalate in the future.
It's harder than you might think. It all depends on who and how high-profile you are. Serbia's got around 7 500 000 residents and it takes a serious company with a serious infrastructure to interconnect them all and provide them with Internet access. Of course, it's incomparably easier to do than with U.S. ISPs, but then again, in the U.S. there are more powerful instances with an interest in bribing the providers than here. After all, who knows? Maybe we're watched as much as others, but I like to think we're (for now, until they catch up) safe from some more tyrannic forms of surveillance.
I know nothing about Serbia, but what are personal bribes like? I know that in Central America and Africa, bribing telecom employees to do things is relatively straightforward.
It probably is "easy" in the US, too, but I'd imagine it'd cost a lot more as people seem to be rather concerned about being caught.
Well, if someone does not give a shit about their job, they will be easy to bribe. I don't know about people working in tech here, but bribing someone to get a job, or have something done "off the record" in the administration is considered normal, and often the only way to achieve something due to even courts and judges being corrupt. Corruption is actually one of our biggest problems, and new governments are focusing their campaigns on that a lot.
And of course I'm not sure. But foreign intelligence agencies have bigger budgets and better connections so they pose a far greater threat. It's more likely that a CA was compromised by the NSA than my ISP :) We aren't completely free of surveillance, but the impact isn't that big like elsewhere. For now, at least...
I am not blaming you, but by you commenting here, you make it ok for the NSA to target all Americans who replied to this thread and all Americans that replied to threads that these Americans replied to in the past and all Americans that replied to threads that these Americans replied to in the past (since the NSA use 3 degree of separation rule).
For example, if Person_1 from a country besides USA calls an American (Person_2), it makes it ok for the NSA to spy on everyone Person_2 calls (lets call them People_3), and everyone People_3 calls (People_4) and everyone People_4 calls... I assume they follow the same rules for internet traffic so they basically get all internet data even if they are technically not allowed to spy on Americans...
>how are you 100% sure that you aren't being watched by your ISP at least? :)
I'm in a similar position so I'll have a shot at this.
Local ISPs tend not to log detail (no business case) and they are legally prohibited from monitoring communication anyway. So the only viable scenario is give the ISP an IP and ask for account owner (IP vs Account is logged). Which they won't do without a warrant (image risk). That combined with the messed up court system means that nothing makes it through the red tape & hassle unless its something intense (child trafficking etc)
As soon as they have the budget, they'll be watching you ;) For the meantime, dozens of foreign intelligence services are probably picking up the slack.
OTOH, if its just public social media data, its naive to think that this wouldn't have happened. If Coke can access social media in realtime through a service such as topsy, why not big brother?
The theoretical answer is that they are a government agency and therefore answerable to us. If we tell them not to drive down even numbered streets they supposedly are supposed to obey that. Of course, we've gone beyond the point where anyone thinks they answer to anybody.
Your theoretical answer doesn't even seem satisfactory. Given that you are American why should the German government be answerable to you? Lets say Japan's people are a-ok with the mass social media surveillance. Theres nothing stopping the Japan government from harvesting your (public) social media data the same way Sony does in order to gauge your interest in Playstation.
Total information awareness is the first truly strategic capability since the development of nuclear weapons 70 years ago. Now it's an arms race. I'm appalled by mass surveillance, and with my limited knowledge of game theory, at this point I don't see any way we can put the shit back in the horse.
Total information awareness is the first truly strategic capability since the development of nuclear weapons 70 years ago.
Where the analogy falls down: It's probably 10X more effective to spy on your own people than to spy on a foreign power. This will result in a magnetic draw towards spying domestically and corruption. Perhaps a better analogy is the greater effectiveness of WWII bombing against civilian populations over industry and military installations, with the result that bombing ended up being aimed primarily against civilian living areas.
(Devil's advocate) The opposite is also true and might warrant such extreme actions. The internet is the most powerful weapon ever conceived in a terrorist's arsenal. It allows for instant and private communications with every person on the planet and unlimited knowledge can be shared, there is also the ability to actually gain direct access to some of the governments systems and they could impersonate, spy, leak, or even cause physical damage to the nation.
If you look at any historical movement of resistance against the powers that be, ever, the primary source of resistance power is embodied in networks of people bound by personal and cultural ties. By gaining detailed intelligence about these networks, governments can potentially place themselves into the position of the perfect oppressors. Online Social Networks are possibly the means by which rebelling AIs will enslave and exterminate the human race.
The advance of technology means that eventually the power available to individuals in the future comes to rival that of small nations today. Then, the only way to avoid calamity would be to use total surveillance to feed AIs that figure out who will become a terrorist before the terrorists themselves realize it. Skynet/The Forbin Project won't be build by the Department of Defense. It will be built by the NSA. And it won't machine gun us to death. It will manipulate culture and society such that Homo sapiens voluntarily stops reproducing and dies out.
How about the AIs pretend to implement brain-uploading of people into a virtual paradise, but it turns out to be a put-on to trick us all into shoving our heads voluntarily into nano disassemblers.
31 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 74.3 ms ] threadFor now.
Reading German tech forums, I get the impression Germans are just as concerned about German surveillance as they are about US surveillance. It's very unpopular and seen as a waste of tax money. Biased sample, though.
It is a little concerning to see things like this happen near me, but for now I am grateful for the lack of pressure on me personally. I would love if the pressure ended everywhere, though, but it seems like it will only escalate in the future.
And how are you 100% sure that you aren't being watched by your ISP at least? :)
It probably is "easy" in the US, too, but I'd imagine it'd cost a lot more as people seem to be rather concerned about being caught.
And of course I'm not sure. But foreign intelligence agencies have bigger budgets and better connections so they pose a far greater threat. It's more likely that a CA was compromised by the NSA than my ISP :) We aren't completely free of surveillance, but the impact isn't that big like elsewhere. For now, at least...
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/07/you-ma...
I'm in a similar position so I'll have a shot at this.
Local ISPs tend not to log detail (no business case) and they are legally prohibited from monitoring communication anyway. So the only viable scenario is give the ISP an IP and ask for account owner (IP vs Account is logged). Which they won't do without a warrant (image risk). That combined with the messed up court system means that nothing makes it through the red tape & hassle unless its something intense (child trafficking etc)
Where the analogy falls down: It's probably 10X more effective to spy on your own people than to spy on a foreign power. This will result in a magnetic draw towards spying domestically and corruption. Perhaps a better analogy is the greater effectiveness of WWII bombing against civilian populations over industry and military installations, with the result that bombing ended up being aimed primarily against civilian living areas.
The advance of technology means that eventually the power available to individuals in the future comes to rival that of small nations today. Then, the only way to avoid calamity would be to use total surveillance to feed AIs that figure out who will become a terrorist before the terrorists themselves realize it. Skynet/The Forbin Project won't be build by the Department of Defense. It will be built by the NSA. And it won't machine gun us to death. It will manipulate culture and society such that Homo sapiens voluntarily stops reproducing and dies out.
How about the AIs pretend to implement brain-uploading of people into a virtual paradise, but it turns out to be a put-on to trick us all into shoving our heads voluntarily into nano disassemblers.