Yep. For those keeping track, swift-lang.org and the article Colin posted in the above comment are about one language, the OP is about a totally different language, and of course the more famous Swift is completely unrelated to either.
I've already seen people confusing features touted for the original Swift language (e.g. good for parallelism) as being pertinent to Apple's. Surely, the good folks at Apple must have been aware of this name conflict.
13 comments
[ 26.6 ms ] story [ 645 ms ] threadhttp://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/200-libby-clark/725...
This name conflict reminds me of the Go vs Go! fiasco: https://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=9
RIP